From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754563AbbFKPmq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:42:46 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:44972 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751806AbbFKPmp (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:42:45 -0400 Message-ID: <5579AC71.1030607@roeck-us.net> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:42:41 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Bolle CC: Jonas Bonn , anees , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Kristiansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] OpenRISC: Fix kernel build problem on OpenRISC References: <1431438321-4697-1-git-send-email-rean12is@gmail.com> <20150512200743.GA6155@roeck-us.net> <1431511102.2398.187.camel@x220> <55534FB4.1070709@roeck-us.net> <1431524020.2650.7.camel@x220> <55535496.6050506@southpole.se> <55789C4F.7000603@roeck-us.net> <1434016363.2271.90.camel@x220> In-Reply-To: <1434016363.2271.90.camel@x220> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/11/2015 02:52 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 13:21 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Wonder if I should step in as interim maintainer to handle urgent >> requests like this one. Comments, thoughts, anyone ? > > This is about a pretty major build issue, that's been known for ten > months now, isn't? If that's correct, this is not an urgent request, but > a chronic issue. So in that case anyone who cares about OpenRISC should > consider taking over. Because this looks like an orphaned architecture > to me. > Those using the architecture simply apply the patch, or a similar patch, or use the tree Stefan maintains at github. Sure, we can wait until Stefan gets a public key and we can add him as maintainer. I guess the active users use Stefan's tree at github anyway. Guenter