From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf,tools: add time out to force stop endless mmap processing
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:52:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557B4691.7090304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07701876D60@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 6/12/15 2:39 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
> Here are the test results.
> Please note that I get "synthesized threads took..." after the test case exit.
> It means both way have the same issue.
Got it. So what you really mean is launching perf on an already running
process perf never finishes initializing. There are several types of
problems like this. For example on a sparc system with a 1024 cpus if I
launch perf (top or record) after starting a kernel build with make -j
1024 the build finishes before perf starts collecting samples. ie., it
never finishes walking /proc until the build is complete. task_diag does
not solve that problem either and in general the procps tools can't
handle it either (ps or top for example).
For your test case what happens if you run:
perf record -- test-app
Is perf overloaded with mmap samples? does it keep up or do you have to
jack the mmap size (-m arg)?
>
> [perf]$ sudo ./perf record -a -- usleep 1
> synthesized threads took 278.780762 sec
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.617 MB perf.data (7974 samples) ]
>
> [perf]$ sudo ./perf record -a --no-task_diag -- usleep 1
> synthesized threads took 315.612403 sec
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.443 MB perf.data (2754 samples) ]
>
ok.
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-10 7:46 [PATCH 1/1] perf,tools: add time out to force stop endless mmap processing kan.liang
2015-06-11 14:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-06-11 14:27 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-11 15:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-06-11 15:21 ` David Ahern
2015-06-11 18:47 ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-12 0:33 ` David Ahern
2015-06-12 14:42 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-12 15:41 ` David Ahern
2015-06-12 17:05 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-12 17:28 ` David Ahern
2015-06-12 18:19 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-12 19:29 ` David Ahern
2015-06-12 19:45 ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-12 20:39 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-12 20:52 ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-06-12 22:41 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-13 4:07 ` David Ahern
2015-06-13 14:59 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-13 4:24 ` David Ahern
2015-06-13 15:06 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-16 15:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-06-16 15:44 ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-16 15:57 ` David Ahern
2015-06-16 16:42 ` Liang, Kan
2015-06-16 18:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557B4691.7090304@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox