From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:14:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55805960.2030008@plumgrid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150616160546.GL3913@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 6/16/15 9:05 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:37:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 05:27:33 -0700
>> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:45:05PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/15 7:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you believe that it is better to fix it within call_rcu()?
>>>>
>>>> found it:
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>>>> index 8cf7304b2867..a3be09d482ae 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>>>> @@ -935,9 +935,9 @@ bool notrace rcu_is_watching(void)
>>>> {
>>>> bool ret;
>>>>
>>>> - preempt_disable();
>>>> + preempt_disable_notrace();
>>>> ret = __rcu_is_watching();
>>>> - preempt_enable();
>>>> + preempt_enable_notrace();
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> the rcu_is_watching() and __rcu_is_watching() are already marked
>>>> notrace, so imo it's a good 'fix'.
>>>> What was happening is that the above preempt_enable was triggering
>>>> recursive call_rcu that was indeed messing 'rdp' that was
>>>> prepared by __call_rcu and before __call_rcu_core could use that.
>>>
>>>> btw, also noticed that local_irq_save done by note_gp_changes
>>>> is partially redundant. In __call_rcu_core path the irqs are
>>>> already disabled.
>>>
>>
>> If rcu_is_watching() and __rcu_is_watching() are both marked as
>> notrace, it makes sense to use preempt_disable/enable_notrace() as it
>> otherwise defeats the purpose of the notrace markers on rcu_is_watching.
>>
>> That is regardless of what the rest of this thread is about.
>
> Good enough! Alexei, are you OK with my adding your Signed-off-by
> to the above patch?
sure.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> (Still not sold on reentrant call_rcu() and
> kfree_rcu(), but getting notrace set up correctly is worthwhile.)
I'm not sold on it either. So far trying to understand
all consequences.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 22:24 call_rcu from trace_preempt Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-15 23:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 1:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 2:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 5:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 6:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 6:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 6:34 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 6:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 6:54 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 12:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 12:38 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 14:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 17:13 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 15:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 17:11 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 17:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 17:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-17 0:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 0:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-17 1:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 1:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-17 8:11 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-17 9:05 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-17 18:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 20:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-17 20:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-17 23:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-18 0:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 15:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 17:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2015-06-16 17:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 18:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 19:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 19:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 19:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55805960.2030008@plumgrid.com \
--to=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox