From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Naohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
namhyung@kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core v3 3/3] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Show usage even if the last event is skipped
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:31:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581061B.8030701@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150616144655.GE10374@kernel.org>
On 2015/06/16 23:46, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:50:57PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> When the last part of converted events are blacklisted or out-of-text,
>> those are skipped and perf probe doesn't show usage examples.
>> This fixes it to show the example even if the last part of event list
>> is skipped.
>>
>> E.g. without this patch, events are added, but suddenly end;
>
> End what? Stop being added?
"End without the last message", I meant.
> I.e. not all eligible events are added? From
> your description the problem seems to be that that last message: "You
> can now use it..." is not presented, but here, without this patch, it
> is:
I see, actually, this happens only if the skipped symbols (
vfs_caches_init_early or vfs_caches_init) are placed at the end of the
matched symbol list. On Ubuntu 15.04 kernel, it doesn't have
vfs_load_quota_inode etc. and the vfs_caches_init is the last part of
the matched list. Since it is hard to reproduce, I've added a Note on
the end of description :)
----
>>
>> Note that this can be reproduced ONLY IF the vfs_caches_init*
>> is the last part of matched symbol list. I've checked this happens
>> on "3.19.0-generic #18-Ubuntu" kernel binary.
>>
----
To reproduce this bug, you need to find a good symbol matching pattern
which (1) matches both of valid function in .text and invalid function
in .inittext (2) invalid one must be on the end of matched function list.
I fortunately hit such pattern and found this bug, but it depends on
the kernel binary.
[...]
> I.e. the only problem I found was this:
>
> [root@zoo ~]# time perf probe -l > /dev/null
>
> real 0m15.408s
> user 0m14.892s
> sys 0m0.534s
> [root@zoo ~]#
> [root@zoo ~]# perf stat perf probe -l > /dev/null
>
> Performance counter stats for 'perf probe -l':
>
> 15256.588897 task-clock (msec) # 1.001 CPUs utilized
> 116 context-switches # 0.008 K/sec
> 4 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> 230,720 page-faults # 0.015 M/sec
> 47,830,405,530 cycles # 3.135 GHz
> 43,974,134,505 stalled-cycles-frontend # 91.94% frontend cycles idle
> <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
> 11,540,587,038 instructions # 0.24 insns per cycle
> # 3.81 stalled cycles per insn
> 2,807,769,592 branches # 184.037 M/sec
> 20,087,075 branch-misses # 0.72% of all branches
>
> 15.240796324 seconds time elapsed
>
> [root@zoo ~]#
>
> Can you check why it takes so long and check the need for this patch?
It is because perf probe -l is not optimized to show a lot of probes yet.
It initializes and loads debuginfo for each probe. I guess we can reuse
debuginfo among them. let me try...
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Linux Technology Research Center, System Productivity Research Dept.
Center for Technology Innovation - Systems Engineering
Hitachi, Ltd., Research & Development Group
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 11:50 [PATCH perf/core v3 0/3] perf-probe bugfixes Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-16 11:50 ` [PATCH perf/core v3 1/3] [BUGFIX] perf probe: List probes in stdout Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-16 11:50 ` [PATCH perf/core v3 2/3] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Fix to return error if no-probe is added Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-18 8:15 ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Fix to return error if no probe " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-16 11:50 ` [PATCH perf/core v3 3/3] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Show usage even if the last event is skipped Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-16 14:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-06-17 5:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2015-06-17 14:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-17 14:58 ` [PATCH perf/core ] perf probe: Speed up perf probe --list by caching debuginfo Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-18 8:17 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-17 15:00 ` Re: [PATCH perf/core v3 3/3] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Show usage even if the last event is skipped Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-06-18 8:16 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-16 13:48 ` [PATCH perf/core v3 0/3] perf-probe bugfixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5581061B.8030701@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=naota@elisp.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox