public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: <mturquette@baylibre.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Andrey Filippov <andrey@elphel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:18:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581ABE1.3030501@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434533368.2069.135.camel@x220>



On 06/17/2015 02:29 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 09:31 -0700, York Sun wrote:
>> COMMON_CLK in Kconfig is changed from bool to tristate so all common
>> clock framework drivers can be selected by users.
> 
> A bool to tristate change isn't needed to make it possible to set a
> symbol manually. That's achieved by adding a prompt (which the patch
> also does).
> 
> This change adds a prompt to the symbol that enables the framework. But,
> as far as I can see, clock drivers depending on that framework already
> can be set manually. So that's another reason the above looks incorrect
> to me.
> 
> Note that the "help" of COMMON_CLK contains:
>     Architectures utilizing the common struct clk should select
>     this option.
> 
> Does the architecture this patch targets perhaps not select COMMON_CLK?
> If that's the case, it seems you should change that architecture
> instead.

Paul,

I did check the mechanism to select COMMON_CLK. It doesn't fit my application.
But it is not in the scope of this patch. I will discuss at the end of this email.

> 
>> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> 
>>  config COMMON_CLK
>> -	bool
>> +	tristate "Common Clock"
>>  	select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
>>  	select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
>>  	select SRCU
> 
> I told you yesterday that setting this to tristate allows over a dozen
> new modules to be created. I'd be surprised if that doesn't break stuff
> left and right without additional changes (which this patch lacks).

Yes you did. I checked over and over and believe enabling this option doesn't
break anything. By enabling it, a dozen modules are built either in the kernel,
or as modules (depending on y or m). They support fix-rate clock and others.

Here is what I am going to do. I will separate the Kconfig from this patch so it
doesn't block this patch from going forward. I will continue exploring the
correct way to enable common clock framework, for my application and for general
use.

York

      reply	other threads:[~2015-06-17 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-16 16:31 [Patch v3] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338 York Sun
2015-06-17  9:29 ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-17 17:18   ` York Sun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5581ABE1.3030501@freescale.com \
    --to=yorksun@freescale.com \
    --cc=andrey@elphel.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox