From: "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, ssantosh@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, d.walter@0x90.at,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:08:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5585D64E.3070709@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5585D10C.5090804@nod.at>
On 6/20/15 1:46 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 04.05.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> Am 04.01.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>>> At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names.
>>> Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx.
>>>
>>> CC lib//jedec_ddr_data.o
>>> In file included from ./arch/um/include/asm/ptrace-generic.h:11:0,
>>> from ./arch/x86/um/asm/ptrace.h:8,
>>> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:8,
>>> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:16,
>>> from include/linux/bitops.h:36,
>>> from include/linux/kernel.h:10,
>>> from include/linux/list.h:8,
>>> from include/linux/module.h:9,
>>> from lib//jedec_ddr_data.c:14:
>>> ./arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace-abi.h:28:0: warning: "R15" redefined [enabled by default]
>>> #define R15 0
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>>> ---
>>> Please note that this patch is untested.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> //richard
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memory/emif.c | 4 ++--
>>> include/memory/jedec_ddr.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>> lib/jedec_ddr_data.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/emif.c b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> index 04644e7..e0aa09f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static u32 get_sdram_tim_1_shdw(const struct lpddr2_timings *timings,
>>> val = max(min_tck->tWTR, DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWTR, t_ck)) - 1;
>>> tim1 |= val << T_WTR_SHIFT;
>>>
>>> - if (addressing->num_banks == B8)
>>> + if (addressing->num_banks == DDR_BANK_8)
>>> val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tFAW, t_ck*4);
>>> else
>>> val = max(min_tck->tRRD, DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRRD, t_ck));
>>> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static u32 get_sdram_tim_1_shdw_derated(const struct lpddr2_timings *timings,
>>> * tFAW is approximately 4 times tRRD. So add 1875*4 = 7500ps
>>> * to tFAW for de-rating
>>> */
>>> - if (addressing->num_banks == B8) {
>>> + if (addressing->num_banks == DDR_BANK_8) {
>>> val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tFAW + 7500, 4 * t_ck) - 1;
>>> } else {
>>> val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRRD + 1875, t_ck);
>>> diff --git a/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h b/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> index ddad0f8..39144d0 100644
>>> --- a/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> +++ b/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> @@ -40,28 +40,28 @@
>>> #define DDR_IO_WIDTH_32 4
>>>
>>> /* Number of Row bits */
>>> -#define R9 9
>>> -#define R10 10
>>> -#define R11 11
>>> -#define R12 12
>>> -#define R13 13
>>> -#define R14 14
>>> -#define R15 15
>>> -#define R16 16
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_9 9
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_10 10
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_11 11
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_12 12
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_13 13
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_14 14
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_15 15
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_16 16
>>>
>>> /* Number of Column bits */
>>> -#define C7 7
>>> -#define C8 8
>>> -#define C9 9
>>> -#define C10 10
>>> -#define C11 11
>>> -#define C12 12
>>> +#define DDR_COL_7 7
>>> +#define DDR_COL_8 8
>>> +#define DDR_COL_9 9
>>> +#define DDR_COL_10 10
>>> +#define DDR_COL_11 11
>>> +#define DDR_COL_12 12
>>>
>>> /* Number of Banks */
>>> -#define B1 0
>>> -#define B2 1
>>> -#define B4 2
>>> -#define B8 3
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_1 0
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_2 1
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_4 2
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_8 3
>>>
>>> /* Refresh rate in nano-seconds */
>>> #define T_REFI_15_6 15600
>>> diff --git a/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c b/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> index 6d2cbf1..2181be4 100644
>>> --- a/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> +++ b/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> @@ -16,16 +16,16 @@
>>> /* LPDDR2 addressing details from JESD209-2 section 2.4 */
>>> const struct lpddr2_addressing
>>> lpddr2_jedec_addressing_table[NUM_DDR_ADDR_TABLE_ENTRIES] = {
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 64M */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 128M */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 256M */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 512M */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS4 */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS4 */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 4G */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_210}, /* 8G */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS2 */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS2 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 64M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 128M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 256M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 512M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS4 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS4 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 4G */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_210}, /* 8G */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS2 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS2 */
>>> };
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lpddr2_jedec_addressing_table);
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>
> *ping -f*
>
Really sorry about that. mMail got lost into filters.
Change looks fine for me.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-20 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-04 15:48 [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers Richard Weinberger
2015-01-16 22:51 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-04 18:44 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-20 20:46 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-20 21:08 ` santosh.shilimkar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5585D64E.3070709@oracle.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=d.walter@0x90.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox