public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, ssantosh@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, d.walter@0x90.at,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:08:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5585D64E.3070709@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5585D10C.5090804@nod.at>



On 6/20/15 1:46 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 04.05.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> Am 04.01.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>>> At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names.
>>> Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx.
>>>
>>>    CC      lib//jedec_ddr_data.o
>>> In file included from ./arch/um/include/asm/ptrace-generic.h:11:0,
>>>                   from ./arch/x86/um/asm/ptrace.h:8,
>>>                   from ./arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:8,
>>>                   from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:16,
>>>                   from include/linux/bitops.h:36,
>>>                   from include/linux/kernel.h:10,
>>>                   from include/linux/list.h:8,
>>>                   from include/linux/module.h:9,
>>>                   from lib//jedec_ddr_data.c:14:
>>> ./arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace-abi.h:28:0: warning: "R15" redefined [enabled by default]
>>>   #define R15 0
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>>> ---
>>> Please note that this patch is untested.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> //richard
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/memory/emif.c      |  4 ++--
>>>   include/memory/jedec_ddr.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>   lib/jedec_ddr_data.c       | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>>   3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/emif.c b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> index 04644e7..e0aa09f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static u32 get_sdram_tim_1_shdw(const struct lpddr2_timings *timings,
>>>   	val = max(min_tck->tWTR, DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWTR, t_ck)) - 1;
>>>   	tim1 |= val << T_WTR_SHIFT;
>>>
>>> -	if (addressing->num_banks == B8)
>>> +	if (addressing->num_banks == DDR_BANK_8)
>>>   		val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tFAW, t_ck*4);
>>>   	else
>>>   		val = max(min_tck->tRRD, DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRRD, t_ck));
>>> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static u32 get_sdram_tim_1_shdw_derated(const struct lpddr2_timings *timings,
>>>   	 * tFAW is approximately 4 times tRRD. So add 1875*4 = 7500ps
>>>   	 * to tFAW for de-rating
>>>   	 */
>>> -	if (addressing->num_banks == B8) {
>>> +	if (addressing->num_banks == DDR_BANK_8) {
>>>   		val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tFAW + 7500, 4 * t_ck) - 1;
>>>   	} else {
>>>   		val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRRD + 1875, t_ck);
>>> diff --git a/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h b/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> index ddad0f8..39144d0 100644
>>> --- a/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> +++ b/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> @@ -40,28 +40,28 @@
>>>   #define DDR_IO_WIDTH_32		4
>>>
>>>   /* Number of Row bits */
>>> -#define R9			9
>>> -#define R10			10
>>> -#define R11			11
>>> -#define R12			12
>>> -#define R13			13
>>> -#define R14			14
>>> -#define R15			15
>>> -#define R16			16
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_9		9
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_10		10
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_11		11
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_12		12
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_13		13
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_14		14
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_15		15
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_16		16
>>>
>>>   /* Number of Column bits */
>>> -#define C7			7
>>> -#define C8			8
>>> -#define C9			9
>>> -#define C10			10
>>> -#define C11			11
>>> -#define C12			12
>>> +#define DDR_COL_7		7
>>> +#define DDR_COL_8		8
>>> +#define DDR_COL_9		9
>>> +#define DDR_COL_10		10
>>> +#define DDR_COL_11		11
>>> +#define DDR_COL_12		12
>>>
>>>   /* Number of Banks */
>>> -#define B1			0
>>> -#define B2			1
>>> -#define B4			2
>>> -#define B8			3
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_1		0
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_2		1
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_4		2
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_8		3
>>>
>>>   /* Refresh rate in nano-seconds */
>>>   #define T_REFI_15_6		15600
>>> diff --git a/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c b/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> index 6d2cbf1..2181be4 100644
>>> --- a/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> +++ b/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> @@ -16,16 +16,16 @@
>>>   /* LPDDR2 addressing details from JESD209-2 section 2.4 */
>>>   const struct lpddr2_addressing
>>>   	lpddr2_jedec_addressing_table[NUM_DDR_ADDR_TABLE_ENTRIES] = {
>>> -	{B4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 64M */
>>> -	{B4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 128M */
>>> -	{B4, T_REFI_7_8,  T_RFC_90}, /* 256M */
>>> -	{B4, T_REFI_7_8,  T_RFC_90}, /* 512M */
>>> -	{B8, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS4 */
>>> -	{B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS4 */
>>> -	{B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 4G */
>>> -	{B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_210}, /* 8G */
>>> -	{B4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS2 */
>>> -	{B4, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS2 */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 64M */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 128M */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8,  T_RFC_90}, /* 256M */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8,  T_RFC_90}, /* 512M */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS4 */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS4 */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 4G */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_210}, /* 8G */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS2 */
>>> +	{DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS2 */
>>>   };
>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lpddr2_jedec_addressing_table);
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>
> *ping -f*
>
Really sorry about that. mMail got lost into filters.
Change looks fine for me.

Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

      reply	other threads:[~2015-06-20 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-04 15:48 [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers Richard Weinberger
2015-01-16 22:51 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-04 18:44 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-20 20:46   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-20 21:08     ` santosh.shilimkar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5585D64E.3070709@oracle.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=d.walter@0x90.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox