From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753411AbbIPSHJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:07:09 -0400 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([78.47.125.74]:50074 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751921AbbIPSHG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:07:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:06:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-api , David Miller Message-ID: <558658516.9497.1442426815738.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <20150916.105720.1147038044649285686.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1441642556-30972-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1441642556-30972-4-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <542470980.9287.1442415954054.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20150916.105720.1147038044649285686.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] sparc/sparc64: allocate sys_membarrier system call number MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [78.47.125.74] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1178 (ZimbraWebClient - FF40 (Linux)/8.6.0_GA_1178) Thread-Topic: sparc/sparc64: allocate sys_membarrier system call number Thread-Index: zcU5nPZCXad0Iutau/07SIh1g72l/g== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- On Sep 16, 2015, at 1:57 PM, David Miller davem@davemloft.net wrote: > From: Mathieu Desnoyers > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:05:54 +0000 (UTC) > >> ----- On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers >> mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers >>> Acked-by: "David S. Miller" >>> CC: Andrew Morton >>> CC: linux-api@vger.kernel.org >>> CC: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org >> >> Hi, >> >> FYI, sys_membarrier has been merged upstream in Linux 4.3-rc1. Feel free >> to wire up this system call on sparc. > > Since I ACK'd this patch which wires the system call up, it should > have been submitted by you directly. That's the whole idea. OK, good to know. Other architecture maintainers chose to pick up the system call wire-up patch themselves. Andrew, can you pick up this patch please ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com