From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753670AbbFXQiJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:38:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40116 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753195AbbFXQh7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:37:59 -0400 Message-ID: <558ADCE3.5090200@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:37:55 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Gleb Natapov , KVM list Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for 4.2 References: <1435078196-13199-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24/06/2015 18:33, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > >> > There are some x86 conflicts, one with the rc8 pull request and >> > the rest with Ingo's FPU rework. > Hmm. I'm dropping the "fx_init(..init_state)" changes from you pull > request, since fx_init is static and only has one caller, and that one > had init_state being false. > > Was there something I missed? That was true even in your tree, > regardless of Ingo's FPU changes? No, you didn't. There was some problem in the rest of the series that introduced init_state, and the unused parameter remained. > If you will grow a second user with init_state set to "true", you'll > have to re-do your patch. No problem. Thanks! Paolo