From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
lee.jones@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH-v2] rtc: 88pm80x: add device tree support
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:16:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558BB1C1.2090400@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150620004354.GY27492@piout.net>
On Saturday 20 June 2015 06:13 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
Sorry I missed this email.
Just wanted to send reminder email and saw this :)
> On 18/06/2015 at 00:28:06 +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote :
>> - pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> - if (pdata == NULL)
>> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No platform data!\n");
>> + if (!pdata && !node) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "pm80x-rtc requires platform data or of_node\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!pdata) {
>> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> I had troubles to follow the rtc_wakeup initialization cleanup but it
> seems OK.
Probably, once we have complete PM support ready then it would be
easier to understand. I think as of now lets have this minimal code for
rtc_wakeup.
> However, I'm wondering why you are adding DT support as this
> will always be probed from the MFD driver which pass the platform_data
> and avoids that allocation.
>
You are right.
Originally, it was cleanup patch,
- remove pm80x_pdata
- Add check for pdata and np
- and around rtc_wakeup
While doing that I added this nice to have allocation.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-25 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-17 18:58 [PATCH-v2 0/3] mfd: 88pm800: Add Device tree support Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-17 18:58 ` [PATCH-v2 1/3] mfd: 88pm800: Add device " Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-17 18:58 ` [PATCH-v2] rtc: 88pm80x: add " Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-20 0:43 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2015-06-25 7:46 ` Vaibhav Hiremath [this message]
2015-07-07 6:37 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-17 18:58 ` [PATCH-v2 2/3] mfd: 88pm800: Allow configuration of interrupt clear method Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-17 18:58 ` [PATCH-v2 3/3] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add new 88pm800 mfd binding Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-23 15:37 ` Rob Herring
2015-06-23 17:02 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-24 0:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-24 5:19 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-06-23 5:07 ` [PATCH-v2 0/3] mfd: 88pm800: Add Device tree support Vaibhav Hiremath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558BB1C1.2090400@linaro.org \
--to=vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=chao.xie@marvell.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox