From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752271AbbFYNkC (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:40:02 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:23684 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751628AbbFYNjy (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:39:54 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,677,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="514113652" Message-ID: <558C03FD.4020600@intel.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:37:01 +0300 From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 08/17] perf tools: Add Intel PT support References: <1432906425-9911-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <1432906425-9911-9-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <20150619160451.GM3079@kernel.org> <55846E97.3050705@intel.com> <20150619194156.GE31188@kernel.org> <20150622182444.GI13937@kernel.org> <55886F7A.30702@intel.com> <20150622230005.GA8510@kernel.org> <5588FCCE.8090403@intel.com> <20150623151553.GD3489@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20150623151553.GD3489@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/06/15 18:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:29:34AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: >> On 23/06/15 02:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> [root@zoo ~]# rpm -q glibc-debuginfo >>> glibc-debuginfo-2.20-8.fc21.x86_64 > >>> But then, it didn't even resolve the DSO, which it should, as I did manually :-/ > >>> Will continue investigating... Perhaps this is fixed in another patch? What I >>> have test merged so far is at my tmp.perf/pt branch. > >> I tried the same commands with perf tools from that branch (tmp.perf/pt) and >> it seemed to work fine. > >> One reason for not getting symbols is compiling perf tools without ELF support. > > sure, but that is not the case here. But yeah, I'll try and triple check > everything, next time will add the list of features detected to the > problem report, so that you know which features were detected. How is it going?