From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
ast@plumgrid.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com,
acme@redhat.com
Cc: wangnan0@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Put perf_events check ahead of bpf prog
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:52:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558E6449.8080103@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435387495-141813-1-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
On 2015/06/27 15:44, He Kuang wrote:
> When we add a kprobe point and record events by perf, the execution path
> of all threads on each cpu will enter this point, but perf may only
> record events on a particular thread or cpu at this kprobe point, a
> check on call->perf_events list filters out the threads which perf is
> not recording.
>
> Currently, bpf_prog will be entered at the beginning of
> kprobe_perf_func() before the above check, which makes bpf_prog be
> executed in every threads including determined not to be recorded
> threads. A simple test can demonstrate this:
>
> 'bpf_prog_on_write.o' contains a bpf prog which outputs to trace buffer
> when it is entered. Run a background thread 'another-dd' and 'dd'
> simultaneously, but only record 'dd' thread by perf. The result shows
> all threads trigger bpf_prog.
>
> $ another-dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=4k count=1000000
> $ perf record -v --event bpf_prog_on_write.o -- dd if=/dev/zero of=test2 bs=4k count=3
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
> another-dd-1007 [000] d... 120.225835: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1007, pid=1007
> another-dd-1007 [000] d... 120.227123: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1007, pid=1007
> [repeat many times...]
> another-dd-1007 [000] d... 120.412395: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1007, pid=1007
> another-dd-1007 [000] d... 120.412524: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1007, pid=1007
> dd-1009 [000] d... 120.413080: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1009, pid=1009
> dd-1009 [000] d... 120.414846: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1009, pid=1009
> dd-1009 [000] d... 120.415013: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1009, pid=1009
> another-dd-1007 [000] d... 120.416128: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1007, pid=1007
> another-dd-1007 [000] d... 120.416295: : generic_perform_write: tgid=1007, pid=1007
>
> This patch moves the check on perf_events list ahead and skip running
> bpf_prog on threads perf not care.
>
> After this patch:
>
> $ another-dd if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=4k count=1000000
> $ perf record -v --event bpf_prog_on_write.o -- dd if=/dev/zero of=test2 bs=4k count=3
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
> dd-994 [000] d... 46.386754: : generic_perform_write: tgid=994, pid=994
> dd-994 [000] d... 46.389167: : generic_perform_write: tgid=994, pid=994
> dd-994 [000] d... 46.389551: : generic_perform_write: tgid=994, pid=994
This looks nice :)
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Thank you!
>
> Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index d0ce590..5600df8 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -1141,13 +1141,13 @@ kprobe_perf_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs)
> int size, __size, dsize;
> int rctx;
>
> - if (prog && !trace_call_bpf(prog, regs))
> - return;
> -
> head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
> if (hlist_empty(head))
> return;
>
> + if (prog && !trace_call_bpf(prog, regs))
> + return;
> +
> dsize = __get_data_size(&tk->tp, regs);
> __size = sizeof(*entry) + tk->tp.size + dsize;
> size = ALIGN(__size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
> @@ -1176,13 +1176,13 @@ kretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> int size, __size, dsize;
> int rctx;
>
> - if (prog && !trace_call_bpf(prog, regs))
> - return;
> -
> head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
> if (hlist_empty(head))
> return;
>
> + if (prog && !trace_call_bpf(prog, regs))
> + return;
> +
> dsize = __get_data_size(&tk->tp, regs);
> __size = sizeof(*entry) + tk->tp.size + dsize;
> size = ALIGN(__size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Linux Technology Research Center, System Productivity Research Dept.
Center for Technology Innovation - Systems Engineering
Hitachi, Ltd., Research & Development Group
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-27 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-27 6:44 [PATCH] bpf: Put perf_events check ahead of bpf prog He Kuang
2015-06-27 7:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-27 8:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558E6449.8080103@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox