From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Subject: Re: [all better] Re: regression: massive trouble with fpu rework
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:50:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5591A177.7050802@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150629064008.GA16251@gmail.com>
On 06/28/2015 11:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Ok, so could you please move the fpu__init_system() further up and see which
> position is that starts breaking with the BIOS option set?
>
> here's the current, broken layout of the code:
>
> get_cpu_cap(c);
> [0] fpu__init_system(c);
>
> if (this_cpu->c_early_init)
> this_cpu->c_early_init(c);
>
> [1]
> c->cpu_index = 0;
> [2]
> filter_cpuid_features(c, false);
>
> [3]
> if (this_cpu->c_bsp_init)
> this_cpu->c_bsp_init(c);
>
> [4]
> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS);
> [5]
> }
>
> and we know it from your testing that moving [0] to [5] fixes the crash.
>
> The question is, can we move it to [4], [3], [2] or even [1] instead, without
> breaking the system?
>
> I still don't see where the breakage comes from, but this would help us narrow it
> down.
>
It should be moved to [4] or [5]. I would argue that the line setting
X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS should moved up and then fpu__init_system(c) should
be moved after the c_bsp_init() line.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-29 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-27 6:25 regression: massive trouble with fpu rework Mike Galbraith
2015-06-27 8:18 ` [all better] " Mike Galbraith
2015-06-27 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-27 8:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-27 9:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-27 11:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-27 21:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2015-06-28 3:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-28 15:06 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2015-06-28 15:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-29 1:12 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2015-06-29 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-29 8:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-29 8:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-29 8:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-29 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-29 9:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-29 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-06-30 5:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-29 12:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-29 13:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-30 5:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-30 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-07-09 13:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2015-06-29 19:50 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2015-06-30 5:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-30 5:24 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Fix FPU related boot regression when CPUID masking BIOS feature is enabled tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-06-27 8:18 ` regression: massive trouble with fpu rework Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5591A177.7050802@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox