From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
<dasaratharaman.chandramouli@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, msr: Allow read access to /dev/cpu/X/msr
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:51:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5591A1D3.6010003@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559005DD.3070003@redhat.com>
On 06/28/2015 07:34 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>> Seriously, though, it would be straightforward to make it handle a
>> more general list, complete with non-architectural stuff (such as the
>> upcoming PPERF in Skylake).
>
> Is it easier to blacklist MSRs we don't want generally exposed, or only expose
> the ones that we think are safe? That's sort of a devil's advocate sort of
> question ;) and I'm wondering what the shorter list is.
>
The second is the only option. Blacklisting MSRs is not safe, as you
have no idea what new MSRs might be introduced.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-29 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-26 17:52 [PATCH] x86, msr: Allow read access to /dev/cpu/X/msr Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-26 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-06-26 19:23 ` Brian Gerst
2015-06-26 21:26 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-28 15:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2015-06-27 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-27 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-27 15:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-28 14:34 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-28 15:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2015-06-29 6:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-29 10:58 ` Matt Fleming
2015-06-29 19:51 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2015-06-30 12:20 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-30 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-30 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-30 13:23 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-07-01 16:38 ` Brown, Len
2015-07-01 17:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-02 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-02 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-07-02 19:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-03 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5591A1D3.6010003@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dasaratharaman.chandramouli@intel.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).