linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:44:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559E3487.1000600@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150709081011.GA31953@gmail.com>

On 09/07/15 11:10, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Known PMUs may not be present for various reasons.
>> Provide a way for the user to know what the reason
>> is.
>>
>> A bus attribute is created for each known PMU beneath
>> a group "known_pmus".  The attribute name is the same
>> as the PMU name.  The value is a string consisting of
>> one or, optionally, two parts: a canonical part, and
>> a driver specific part.  If there are two parts, they
>> are separated by " - ".  The canonical part is one of:
>>
>> 	Supported
>> 	Driver error
>> 	Driver not loaded
>> 	Driver not in kernel config
>> 	Not supported by kernel
>> 	Not supported by hardware
>> 	Wrong vendor
>> 	Wrong architecture
>> 	Unknown status
> 
> Very nice!
> 
>> Example:
>>
>> 	$ cat /sys/bus/event_source/known_pmus/intel_pt
>> 	Supported
> 
> So I only have naming nits. 'Supported' is a bit ambiguous, because it could mean 
> that the PMU is supported but the driver is not active. How about 'Enabled'?
> 
> I'd also make the strings more unambiguously structured, something like:
> 
> 	Enabled
> 	Disabled: Driver error
> 	Disabled: Driver not loaded
> 	Disabled: Driver not in kernel config
> 	Disabled: Not supported by the kernel
> 	Disabled: Not supported by the hardware
> 	Disabled: Not supported by the hardware vendor
> 	Disabled: Not supported by the the architecture
> 	Disabled: Unknown status
> 
> (Note the small changes I did to the text in some places.)

OK

> 
> Also note that I'd suggest not enumerating all the error reasons rigidly - just 
> have a single error code, but a free flowing error string that is provided by the 
> low level driver (and maybe strdup()-ed by the core). That way you can provide 
> very specific error descriptions, without having to change the core every time you 
> need a new category. Agreed?

Drivers can optionally provide a string - the optional second part described above.
For example:

	$ cat /sys/bus/event_source/known_pmus/intel_pt
	Disabled: Not supported by the hardware - ToPA output is not supported on this CPU

Having a finite set of categories allows software to interpret the string for
purposes other than displaying it.  Having an optional second part allows
drivers to detail anything else.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-09  7:48 [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Adrian Hunter
2015-07-09  8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-09  8:44   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2015-07-09  8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09  9:26   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-09 11:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 12:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-09 12:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 14:47           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-10  8:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-10 18:59             ` Stephane Eranian
2015-07-09  9:30   ` Adrian Hunter
2015-07-09 11:44     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559E3487.1000600@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).