From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
<linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_perfcount_int() declaration
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:43:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A3885A.5010002@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150712231129.11177.40742.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3947 bytes --]
On 13/07/15 00:11, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Weak header file declarations are error-prone because they make every
> definition weak, and the linker chooses one based on link order (see
> 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak annotation from pcibios_get_phb_of_node
> decl")).
>
> get_c0_perfcount_int() is defined in several files. Every definition is
> weak, so I assume Kconfig prevents two or more from being included. The
> callers contain identical default code used when get_c0_perfcount_int()
> isn't defined at all.
>
> Add a weak get_c0_perfcount_int() definition with the default code and
> remove the weak annotation from the declaration.
>
> Then the platform implementations will be strong and will override the weak
> default. If multiple platforms are ever configured in, we'll get a link
> error instead of calling a random platform's implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> CC: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/time.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c | 7 +------
> arch/mips/kernel/time.c | 10 +++++++++-
> arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c | 8 +-------
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h
> index 8ab2874..ce6a7d5 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ extern unsigned int mips_hpt_frequency;
> * so it lives here.
> */
> extern int (*perf_irq)(void);
> -extern int __weak get_c0_perfcount_int(void);
> +extern int get_c0_perfcount_int(void);
>
> /*
> * Initialize the calling CPU's compare interrupt as clockevent device
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
> index cc1b6fa..c126b1c 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
> @@ -1682,12 +1682,7 @@ init_hw_perf_events(void)
> counters = counters_total_to_per_cpu(counters);
> #endif
>
> - if (get_c0_perfcount_int)
> - irq = get_c0_perfcount_int();
> - else if (cp0_perfcount_irq >= 0)
> - irq = MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + cp0_perfcount_irq;
> - else
> - irq = -1;
> + irq = get_c0_perfcount_int();
>
> mipspmu.map_raw_event = mipsxx_pmu_map_raw_event;
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
> index 8d01709..ec7082d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
> @@ -55,9 +55,17 @@ static int null_perf_irq(void)
> }
>
> int (*perf_irq)(void) = null_perf_irq;
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(perf_irq);
>
> +#ifdef MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE
why the ifdef? This would be the only such ifdef in the kernel, and
arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/irq.h seems to ensure it is always
defined anyway.
Aside from that the patch looks good.
Cheers
James
> +int __weak get_c0_perfcount_int(void)
> +{
> + if (cp0_perfcount_irq >= 0)
> + return MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + cp0_perfcount_irq;
> + return -1;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * time_init() - it does the following things.
> *
> diff --git a/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c b/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c
> index 6a6e2cc..c0cffa9 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c
> @@ -438,13 +438,7 @@ static int __init mipsxx_init(void)
> save_perf_irq = perf_irq;
> perf_irq = mipsxx_perfcount_handler;
>
> - if (get_c0_perfcount_int)
> - perfcount_irq = get_c0_perfcount_int();
> - else if (cp0_perfcount_irq >= 0)
> - perfcount_irq = MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + cp0_perfcount_irq;
> - else
> - perfcount_irq = -1;
> -
> + perfcount_irq = get_c0_perfcount_int();
> if (perfcount_irq >= 0)
> return request_irq(perfcount_irq, mipsxx_perfcount_int,
> IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NOBALANCING |
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-12 23:10 [PATCH 0/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" usage Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] MIPS: CPC: Remove "weak" from mips_cpc_phys_base() and make it static Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from platform_maar_init() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:46 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 3/9] MIPS: VPE: Exit vpe_release() early if vpe_run() isn't defined Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] MIPS: MT: Remove "weak" from vpe_run() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 10:27 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 21:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 5/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_perfcount_int() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:43 ` James Hogan [this message]
2015-07-13 21:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_compare_int() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:36 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_fdc_int() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:31 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from mips_cdmm_phys_base() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:20 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:12 ` [PATCH 9/9] MIPS: Remove "__weak" definition from arch-specific linkage.h Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 10:08 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A3885A.5010002@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).