From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754615AbbGMUwK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:52:10 -0400
Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:34165 "EHLO
	saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752024AbbGMUwI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:52:08 -0400
Message-ID: <55A424F6.6080304@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:52:06 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= <heiko@sntech.de>
CC: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] iio: adc: rockchip_saradc: add missing MODULE_*
 data
References: <8215730.uluDfnE1h7@diego> <55A1533A.2080507@kernel.org> <79826456.QduC5uXeBP@diego> <9AE8F596-1594-4B92-B06E-C6F14527239D@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <9AE8F596-1594-4B92-B06E-C6F14527239D@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 13/07/15 10:23, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11 July 2015 19:59:31 BST, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> Am Samstag, 11. Juli 2015, 18:32:42 schrieb Jonathan Cameron:
>>> On 08/07/15 15:17, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>>> The module-data is currently missing. This includes the
>>>> license-information
>>>> which makes the driver taint the kernel and miss symbols when
>> compiled as
>>>> module.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 44d6f2ef94f9 ("iio: adc: add driver for Rockchip saradc")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>>
>>> Sorry Heiko,
>>>
>>> Not entirely sure why I haven't picked this up before.
>>>
>>> Anyhow, now applied to the fixes-for-4.2 branch of iio.git
>>> and marked for stable.  I need to catch up with a bit of a
>>> backlog, but should get a pull request out to Greg sometime
>>> early next week.
>>
>> really no problem. I track my patches and generally simply keep
>> pestering 
>> people for as long as it takes ;-)
>>
> Very sensible!
In this case I was being a muppet.  Had two running fixes branches
(requests just sent for both of them) and I'd applied it to the other
one.  Hence when I got to the pull request it was in both of them.
Have dropped it from the post merge window one as it was fine in the
other.

Oops!
>> Heiko
>