linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Subject:  [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
@ 2015-07-13 19:36 Joseph Salisbury
  2015-07-14  2:42 ` Jiang Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2015-07-13 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jiang.liu
  Cc: konrad.wilk, tony.luck, joro, Greg KH, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, rdunlap, Yinghai Lu, bp,
	len.brown, pavel, Thomas Gleixner, LKML, Rafael J. Wysocki, pavel,
	mingo, hpa, x86, linux-pm

Hello Jiang,

A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
reverting the following commit resolves this bug:

commit cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079
Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon Oct 27 16:11:52 2014 +0800

    x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI

The regression was introduced as of v3.19-rc1.
    
I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
or would it be best to submit a revert request?
    
    
Thanks,

Joe


[0] http://pad.lv/1440072


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Subject:  [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
  2015-07-13 19:36 Subject: [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI Joseph Salisbury
@ 2015-07-14  2:42 ` Jiang Liu
  2015-07-14 16:11   ` Joseph Salisbury
  2015-07-14 17:22   ` Joseph Salisbury
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2015-07-14  2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joseph Salisbury
  Cc: konrad.wilk, tony.luck, joro, Greg KH, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, rdunlap, Yinghai Lu, bp,
	len.brown, pavel, Thomas Gleixner, LKML, mingo, hpa, x86,
	linux-pm

On 2015/7/14 3:36, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hello Jiang,
> 
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
> reverting the following commit resolves this bug:
> 
> commit cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079
> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Mon Oct 27 16:11:52 2014 +0800
> 
>     x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
> 
> The regression was introduced as of v3.19-rc1.
>     
> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
Hi Joseph,
	Sorry for the trouble. It would be great if we could get
more information about the bug, such as bug report info, dmesg and
acpidump from the reporting system.
Thanks!
Gerry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Subject:  [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
  2015-07-14  2:42 ` Jiang Liu
@ 2015-07-14 16:11   ` Joseph Salisbury
  2015-07-14 17:22   ` Joseph Salisbury
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2015-07-14 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu
  Cc: konrad.wilk, tony.luck, joro, Greg KH, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, rdunlap, Yinghai Lu, bp,
	len.brown, pavel, Thomas Gleixner, LKML, mingo, hpa, x86,
	linux-pm

On 07/13/2015 10:42 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/7/14 3:36, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> Hello Jiang,
>>
>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
>> reverting the following commit resolves this bug:
>>
>> commit cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079
>> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>> Date:   Mon Oct 27 16:11:52 2014 +0800
>>
>>     x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
>>
>> The regression was introduced as of v3.19-rc1.
>>     
>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
> Hi Joseph,
> 	Sorry for the trouble. It would be great if we could get
> more information about the bug, such as bug report info, dmesg and
> acpidump from the reporting system.
> Thanks!
> Gerry

Hi Gerry,

Thanks for the response!  The full bug report can be seen here:
http://pad.lv/1440072

A bug was also opened on bugzilla.kernel.org(I see you already responded
there):
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101301

The dmesg output can be found here:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/205757938/CurrentDmesg.txt

I'll request an acpidump from the reporting system.

Thanks again,

Joe



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Subject:  [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
  2015-07-14  2:42 ` Jiang Liu
  2015-07-14 16:11   ` Joseph Salisbury
@ 2015-07-14 17:22   ` Joseph Salisbury
  2015-07-15  3:17     ` Jiang Liu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2015-07-14 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu
  Cc: konrad.wilk, tony.luck, joro, Greg KH, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, rdunlap, Yinghai Lu, bp,
	len.brown, pavel, Thomas Gleixner, LKML, mingo, hpa, x86,
	linux-pm

On 07/13/2015 10:42 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/7/14 3:36, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> Hello Jiang,
>>
>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
>> reverting the following commit resolves this bug:
>>
>> commit cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079
>> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>> Date:   Mon Oct 27 16:11:52 2014 +0800
>>
>>     x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
>>
>> The regression was introduced as of v3.19-rc1.
>>     
>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
> Hi Joseph,
> 	Sorry for the trouble. It would be great if we could get
> more information about the bug, such as bug report info, dmesg and
> acpidump from the reporting system.
> Thanks!
> Gerry
Comments 3 and 4 have the requested information in the bugzilla bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101301

Thanks again for the help!

Joe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Subject:  [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
  2015-07-14 17:22   ` Joseph Salisbury
@ 2015-07-15  3:17     ` Jiang Liu
  2015-07-15 16:05       ` Joseph Salisbury
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2015-07-15  3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joseph Salisbury
  Cc: konrad.wilk, tony.luck, joro, Greg KH, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, rdunlap, Yinghai Lu, bp,
	len.brown, pavel, Thomas Gleixner, LKML, mingo, hpa, x86,
	linux-pm

On 2015/7/15 1:22, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 07/13/2015 10:42 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2015/7/14 3:36, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>>> Hello Jiang,
>>>
>>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
>>> reverting the following commit resolves this bug:
>>>
>>> commit cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079
>>> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>>> Date:   Mon Oct 27 16:11:52 2014 +0800
>>>
>>>     x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
>>>
>>> The regression was introduced as of v3.19-rc1.
>>>     
>>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
>>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>> Hi Joseph,
>> 	Sorry for the trouble. It would be great if we could get
>> more information about the bug, such as bug report info, dmesg and
>> acpidump from the reporting system.
>> Thanks!
>> Gerry
> Comments 3 and 4 have the requested information in the bugzilla bug:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
> 
> Thanks again for the help!
Hi Joseph,
	According to my investigation, it's an ACPI BIOS issue instead
of a kernel bug. But it's actually a regression. Now we enforce stricter
check for ACPI SCI interrupt, which exposes an implementation flaw in
the virtual BIOS.

I have posted the analysis at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
But I have no account at launchpad, so could you please help to copy
the message to launchpad?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1440072

Thanks!
Gerry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Subject:  [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
  2015-07-15  3:17     ` Jiang Liu
@ 2015-07-15 16:05       ` Joseph Salisbury
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2015-07-15 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu
  Cc: konrad.wilk, tony.luck, joro, Greg KH, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, rdunlap, Yinghai Lu, bp,
	len.brown, pavel, Thomas Gleixner, LKML, mingo, hpa, x86,
	linux-pm

On 07/14/2015 11:17 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/7/15 1:22, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> On 07/13/2015 10:42 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> On 2015/7/14 3:36, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>>>> Hello Jiang,
>>>>
>>>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
>>>> reverting the following commit resolves this bug:
>>>>
>>>> commit cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079
>>>> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Date:   Mon Oct 27 16:11:52 2014 +0800
>>>>
>>>>     x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
>>>>
>>>> The regression was introduced as of v3.19-rc1.
>>>>     
>>>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
>>>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>>>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>>> Hi Joseph,
>>> 	Sorry for the trouble. It would be great if we could get
>>> more information about the bug, such as bug report info, dmesg and
>>> acpidump from the reporting system.
>>> Thanks!
>>> Gerry
>> Comments 3 and 4 have the requested information in the bugzilla bug:
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
>>
>> Thanks again for the help!
> Hi Joseph,
> 	According to my investigation, it's an ACPI BIOS issue instead
> of a kernel bug. But it's actually a regression. Now we enforce stricter
> check for ACPI SCI interrupt, which exposes an implementation flaw in
> the virtual BIOS.
>
> I have posted the analysis at
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
> But I have no account at launchpad, so could you please help to copy
> the message to launchpad?
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1440072
>
> Thanks!
> Gerry
Thanks for the analysis and feedback, Gerry.  I'll update the launchpad
bug with your info.

Thanks,

Joe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-15 16:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-13 19:36 Subject: [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI Joseph Salisbury
2015-07-14  2:42 ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-14 16:11   ` Joseph Salisbury
2015-07-14 17:22   ` Joseph Salisbury
2015-07-15  3:17     ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-15 16:05       ` Joseph Salisbury

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).