From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: by default, limit maximum discard size to 64MB
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:30:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A67C9D.7000009@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A64828.6030007@gmail.com>
On 07/15/2015 05:46 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-07-14 17:48, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 07/14/2015 02:45 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 07/14/2015 02:44 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 14 2015 at 2:48pm -0400,
>>>> Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lots of devices exhibit very high latencies for big discards, hurting
>>>>> reads and writes. By default, limit the max discard we will build to
>>>>> 64MB. This value has shown good results across a number of devices.
>>>>>
>>>>> This will potentially hurt discard throughput, from a provisioning
>>>>> point of view (when the user does mkfs.xfs, for instance, and mkfs
>>>>> issues a full device discard). If that becomes an issue, we could
>>>>> have different behavior for provisioning vs runtime discards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
>>>>
>>>> Christoph suggested you impose this default for the specific
>>>> drivers/devices that benefit. I'm not following why imposing a 64MB
>>>> default is the right thing to do for all devices.
>>>
>>> I'd argue that's most of them... But the testing we did was on NVMe. I
>>> can limit it to NVMe, no big deal.
>>
>> Oh, and LSI flash too, so not just NVMe.
>>
> While I don't have time to test it, I have a feeling that such a limit
> would help with many of the consumer SSD's out there. Secondarily, once
> this gets in and discard is fixed for BTRFS, I'll have some performance
> testing to do WRT dm-thinp.
Right, that was the point of it. After more consideration, a default
"sane" limit should be applied to any non-stacked device.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 18:48 [PATCH 0/3 v2] Configurable max discard size Jens Axboe
2015-07-14 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: have drivers use blk_queue_max_discard_sectors() Jens Axboe
2015-07-16 14:46 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-07-14 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: make /sys/block/<dev>/queue/discard_max_bytes writeable Jens Axboe
2015-07-16 15:07 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-07-16 15:11 ` Jens Axboe
2015-07-14 18:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: by default, limit maximum discard size to 64MB Jens Axboe
2015-07-14 20:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-07-14 20:45 ` Jens Axboe
2015-07-14 21:48 ` Jens Axboe
2015-07-15 11:46 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-07-15 15:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-07-15 16:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-07-15 22:14 ` Jens Axboe
2015-08-05 13:34 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A67C9D.7000009@fb.com \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).