From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756106AbbGPPyQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:54:16 -0400
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:54628 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756049AbbGPPyO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:54:14 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,488,1432623600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="607486141"
Message-ID: <55A7D38C.7070907@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:53:48 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86, mpx: do not set ->vm_ops on mpx VMAs
References: <1436784852-144369-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <1436784852-144369-3-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20150713165323.GA7906@redhat.com> <55A3EFE9.7080101@linux.intel.com> <20150716110503.9A4F5196@black.fi.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150716110503.9A4F5196@black.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 07/16/2015 04:05 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> > These both look nice to me (and they both cull specialty MPX code which
>> > is excellent).  I'll run them through a quick test.
> Any update?

Both patches look fine to me and test OK.  Feel free to add my
acked/tested/etc...