From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Justin M. Forbes" <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] fs: direct-io: don't dirtying pages for ITER_BVEC/ITER_KVEC direct read
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:48:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A7E063.20003@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437061068-26118-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
On 07/16/2015 10:37 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> When direct read IO is submitted from kernel, it is often
> unnecessary to dirty pages, for example of loop, dirtying pages
> have been considered in the upper filesystem(over loop) side
> already, and they don't need to be dirtied again.
>
> So this patch doesn't dirtying pages for ITER_BVEC/ITER_KVEC
> direct read, and loop should be the 1st case to use ITER_BVEC/ITER_KVEC
> for direct read I/O.
>
> The patch is based on previous Dave's patch.
>
> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/direct-io.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index 745d234..07e4b28 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ struct dio {
> int page_errors; /* errno from get_user_pages() */
> int is_async; /* is IO async ? */
> bool defer_completion; /* defer AIO completion to workqueue? */
> + bool should_dirty; /* if pages should be dirtied */
> int io_error; /* IO error in completion path */
> unsigned long refcount; /* direct_io_worker() and bios */
> struct bio *bio_list; /* singly linked via bi_private */
> @@ -393,7 +394,7 @@ static inline void dio_bio_submit(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio)
> dio->refcount++;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dio->bio_lock, flags);
>
> - if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ)
> + if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ && dio->should_dirty)
> bio_set_pages_dirty(bio);
>
> if (sdio->submit_io)
> @@ -464,13 +465,14 @@ static int dio_bio_complete(struct dio *dio, struct bio *bio)
> if (!uptodate)
> dio->io_error = -EIO;
>
> - if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ) {
> + if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ && dio->should_dirty) {
> bio_check_pages_dirty(bio); /* transfers ownership */
> } else {
> bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
> struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
>
> - if (dio->rw == READ && !PageCompound(page))
> + if (dio->rw == READ && !PageCompound(page) &&
> + dio->should_dirty)
> set_page_dirty_lock(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
> }
> @@ -1217,6 +1219,7 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
> spin_lock_init(&dio->bio_lock);
> dio->refcount = 1;
>
> + dio->should_dirty = (iter->type == ITER_IOVEC);
> sdio.iter = iter;
> sdio.final_block_in_request =
> (offset + iov_iter_count(iter)) >> blkbits;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 15:37 [PATCH v7 0/6] block: loop: improve loop with AIO Ming Lei
2015-07-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] fs: direct-io: don't dirtying pages for ITER_BVEC/ITER_KVEC direct read Ming Lei
2015-07-16 16:48 ` Dave Kleikamp [this message]
2015-07-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] block: loop: set QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES for request queue of loop Ming Lei
2015-07-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] block: loop: use kthread_work Ming Lei
2015-07-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] block: loop: prepare for supporing direct IO Ming Lei
2015-07-27 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-27 9:41 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-27 9:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-27 9:53 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-27 17:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-29 7:33 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-29 8:41 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-29 11:21 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-29 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-30 8:01 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-27 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] block: loop: introduce ioctl command of LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO Ming Lei
2015-07-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] block: loop: support DIO & AIO Ming Lei
2015-07-23 9:00 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] block: loop: improve loop with AIO Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A7E063.20003@oracle.com \
--to=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jforbes@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox