From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946326AbbGQJLW (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:11:22 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:33613 "EHLO mail-la0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932550AbbGQJLS (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:11:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example To: Javier Martinez Canillas , Lee Jones References: <1437114567-17629-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <1437114567-17629-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Sergei Shtylyov Message-ID: <55A8C6B2.5020109@cogentembedded.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:11:14 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1437114567-17629-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 7/17/2015 9:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat ePAPR. > generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise > programming model." > So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic > node name instead of using the chip's name. > Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas MBR, Sergei