Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] bpf: Implement function bpf_read_pmu() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter

["Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>]

On 2015/7/17 19:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:55:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:45:02PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>>
>>>> Depends on what all you need, if you need full perf events to work then
>>>> yes perf_event_read_value() is your only option.
>>>>
>>>> But note that that requires scheduling, so you cannot actually use it
>>>> for tracing purposes etc..
>>> What you mean "full perf events"? Even with your code some event still not
>>> work?
>> The code I posted only works for events that do not have inherit set.
>> And only works from IRQ/NMI context for events that monitor the current
>> task or the current CPU (although that needs a little extra code still).
>>
>> Anything else and it does not work (correctly).
> Scratch that from NMI, for that to work we need more magic still.
The scheduling you said is caused by

mutex_lock(&event->child_mutex)

right?

What about replacing it to mutex_trylock() and simply return an error
if it read from a BPF program?

Thank you.