From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] atomics: add acquire/release/relaxed variants of some atomic operations
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:19:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A9393A.403@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150717094014.GD18994@arm.com>
On 07/17/2015 05:40 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:07:28AM +0100, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 07/16/2015 11:32 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> +#ifndef atomic64_add_return_relaxed
>>> +#define atomic64_add_return_relaxed atomic64_add_return
>>> +#define atomic64_add_return_acquire atomic64_add_return
>>> +#define atomic64_add_return_release atomic64_add_return
>>> +
>>> +#else /* atomic64_add_return_relaxed */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef atomic64_add_return_acquire
>>> +#define atomic64_add_return_acquire(...) \
>>> + __atomic_op_acquire(long long, atomic64_add_return, __VA_ARGS__)
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef atomic64_add_return_release
>>> +#define atomic64_add_return_release(...) \
>>> + __atomic_op_release(long long, atomic64_add_return, __VA_ARGS__)
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef atomic64_add_return
>>> +#define atomic64_add_return(...) \
>>> + __atomic_op_fence(long long, atomic64_add_return, __VA_ARGS__)
>>> +#endif
>>> +#endif /* atomic64_add_return_relaxed */
>>> +
>> I have a minor nit. The atomic_add_return block is repeated with
>> "s/atomic_add_return/.../". Perhaps some more comments to delineate the
>> blocks more visibly will make this patch easier to read.
> Yeah, I agree that it's pretty hard going, but I don't have any great
> suggestions to solve that. I could add an extra blank line + comment
> before the start of each section, if you like? Example snippet below.
>
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> [...]
> #endif /* atomic_sub_return_relaxed */
>
>
> /* atomic_xchg_relaxed */
> #ifndef atomic_xchg_relaxed
> #define atomic_xchg_relaxed atomic_xchg
> #define atomic_xchg_acquire atomic_xchg
> #define atomic_xchg_release atomic_xchg
>
> #else /* atomic_xchg_relaxed */
>
> #ifndef atomic_xchg_acquire
> #define atomic_xchg_acquire(...) \
> __atomic_op_acquire(int, atomic_xchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> #endif
>
> #ifndef atomic_xchg_release
> #define atomic_xchg_release(...) \
> __atomic_op_release(int, atomic_xchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> #endif
>
> #ifndef atomic_xchg
> #define atomic_xchg(...) \
> __atomic_op_fence(int, atomic_xchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> #endif
> #endif /* atomic_xchg_relaxed */
>
>
> /* atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed */
> [...]
Something like
/* BEGIN atomc_xchg_relax */
...
/* END atomic_xchg_relax */
may help.
Alternatively, I sometimes add a line separator like
/*===================[ atomic_xchg_relax ]====================*/
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 15:32 [PATCH v2 0/7] Add generic support for relaxed atomics Will Deacon
2015-07-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] atomics: add acquire/release/relaxed variants of some atomic operations Will Deacon
2015-07-17 0:07 ` Waiman Long
2015-07-17 9:40 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-17 17:19 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2015-07-17 17:30 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] asm-generic: rework atomic-long.h to avoid bulk code duplication Will Deacon
2015-07-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] asm-generic: add relaxed/acquire/release variants for atomic_long_t Will Deacon
2015-07-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] lockref: remove homebrew cmpxchg64_relaxed macro definition Will Deacon
2015-07-16 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-16 17:00 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] locking/qrwlock: make use of acquire/release/relaxed atomics Will Deacon
2015-07-16 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-16 18:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] include/llist: use linux/atomic.h instead of asm/cmpxchg.h Will Deacon
2015-07-16 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: atomics: define our SMP atomics in terms of _relaxed operations Will Deacon
2015-07-16 20:40 ` Waiman Long
2015-07-16 21:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-17 0:00 ` Waiman Long
2015-07-17 9:35 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-17 17:17 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A9393A.403@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).