From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753398AbbGQUaF (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:30:05 -0400 Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:42041 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753198AbbGQUaD (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:30:03 -0400 Message-ID: <55A965C8.3010304@sr71.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:30:00 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Denys Vlasenko , Brian Gerst , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu, fork: Dynamically allocate 'struct fpu' References: <1437128892-9831-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> <1437128892-9831-2-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> <20150717192348.GB24300@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150717192348.GB24300@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/17/2015 12:23 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Dave, can I put your Signed-off-by into this patch? I have already tested these > two patches and they are looking good here - so unless you can see some breakage > or other problem I'd prefer it to keep it two patches. Everything looks good here with your actual two patches applied: Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen