From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756126AbbGTNls (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:41:48 -0400
Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:46194 "EHLO
	SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753024AbbGTNlq (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:41:46 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,508,1432598400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="285693663"
Message-ID: <55ACFA96.9060102@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:41:42 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched()
 instead of should_resched()
References: <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz>
In-Reply-To: <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DLP: MIA1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 15/07/15 10:52, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> This code is used only when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and only in non-atomic context:
> xen_in_preemptible_hcall is set only in privcmd_ioctl_hypercall().
> Thus preempt_count is zero and should_resched() is equal to need_resched().

Applied to for-linus-4.3, thanks.

David