Re: Linux-next, Exynos Octa boot fail, bisected to: "drm/exynos: remove drm_iommu_attach_device_if_possible"

Inki Dae
2015-07-22T10:08:57Z

On 2015년 07월 22일 17:42, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> On 07/22/2015 05:22 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> On 2015년 07월 22일 17:12, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>>> On 07/22/2015 01:55 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>> On 2015년 07월 22일 11:02, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>>>>> On 07/21/2015 10:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Today's linux-next (next-20150721) encounters boot failures on Exynos
>>>>>> Octa (Exynos5422) based boards. The boards hangs. I bisected it to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> d80167b85024982c5f18d0481a5c248100360118 is the first bad commit
>>>>>> commit d80167b85024982c5f18d0481a5c248100360118
>>>>>> Author: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Date: Thu Jul 2 21:49:39 2015 +0900
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drm/exynos: remove drm_iommu_attach_device_if_possible
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Already drm_iommu_attach_device checks whether support iommu internally.
>>>>>> It should clear channels always regardless iommu support. We didn't know
>>>>>> because we can detect the problem when iommu is enabled, so we don't
>>>>>> have to use drm_iommu_attach_device_if_possible and then we can remove
>>>>>> drm_iommu_attach_device_if_possible and clear_channels function pointer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :040000 040000 83379efbf4960f58d680371628ec04387935bd53
>>>>>> da03c338b88e7cb6bda895b3dd52d78d9b6eba30 M drivers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Config: exynos
>>>>>> Boot log from Odroid XU3-Lite attached.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any hints or ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> The point that hangs is when accesses fimd register in
>>>>> fimd_clear_channels function, so i doubt clock setting for fimd.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's gone something that hangs after i enable gating for ACLK_200_DISP1
>>>>> clock.
>>>>>
>>>>> If ACLK_200_DISP1 clock needs for fimd really, i'm thinking how can it
>>>>> support. Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> I think bootloader should have enabled ACLK_200_DISP1 clock and also
>>>> device driver should enable all relevant clocks before the device
>>>> accesses its own registers.
>>>>
>>>> Best way would be that the clock is enabled by common clock framework
>>>> but it seems there is no anything that the clock framework can do it. So
>>>> I think what we have to do is to add the clock support to device tree.
>>>
>>> It's not easy problem to me. Should we add which clock? I think we
>>> cannot control ACLK_200_DISP1 or CLKDIV2_DISP1_BLK directly by below
>>> hierarchy, right? Then we should control gate clocks, but we have not
>>> controlled any gate clocks using BTS_ prefix.
>>>
>>> The clock hierarchy from Exynos5422 user manual,
>>> ACLK_200_DISP1 -- CLKDIV2_DISP1_BLK -- HDMI LINK
>>> HDMI PHY
>>> MIC1
>>> DSIM1
>>> DPTX LINK
>>> MDNIE1
>>> SYSMMU_MIXER
>>> SYSMMU_FIMD1_M0
>>> SYSMMU_FIMD1_M1
>>> BTS_TVM0
>>> BTS_TVM1
>>> BTS_FIMD1_M0
>>> BTS_FIMD1_M1
>>>
>>> Other way, IMHO, fimd driver doesn't have to enable ACLK_200_DISP1 clock,
>>> just it should be controlled by connector drivers, e.g. dsi, dp because
>>> fimd only cannot operate, so dsi or dp must need (Actually i'm not sure
>>> about this, just i thought that Exynos5 SoCs don't have any gpios for
>>> dpi, so they cannot use dpi, right?).
>>>
>>> It needs to probe connector driver like dsi or dp earlier than fimd and
>>> fimd_bind function should return error if connector driver like dsi or
>>> dp was not probed. This is also not easy to me.
>>
>> In this case, if one of above gate clocks is enabled, the ACLK_200_DISP1
>> should be enabled. So I guess the problem would be due to below line of
>> clk-exynos5420.c,
>>
>> GATE(CLK_FIMD1, "fimd1", "aclk300_disp1", GATE_IP_DISP1, 0, 0, 0),
>>
>> Can you check it again after modifying it like below?,
>> GATE(CLK_FIMD1, "fimd1", "aclk200_disp1", GATE_IP_DISP1, 0, 0, 0),
>
> No, parent clock of fimd1 gate clock is ACLK_300_DISP1.

Yes, I checked just it through exynos5420 and exynos5422 document. I
just guessed. So do you mean that aclk200_disp1 affects FIMD controller
even though aclk200_disp1 isn't a parent clock of FIMD? If so, it's very
strange.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>