public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, bp@suse.de,
	toshi.kani@hp.com, jgross@suse.com, mcgrof@suse.com,
	"mnipxh@163.com" <mnipxh@163.com>,
	"yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3] x86/mm/pat: Do a small optimization and fix in reserve_memtype
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:38:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AF2C68.5010304@intel.com> (raw)

From: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>

It's more reasonable to unlock memtype_lock right after
rbt_memtype_check_insert. memtype_lock protects all data stored in
rb-tree from multiple access. It's not cool to call kfree, pr_info, etc
with this lock held. So move spin_unlock a little ahead.

If *new* succeed to be stored into the rb-tree, we might hit panic.
Because we access *new* in dprintk "cattr_name(new->type)". Data stored
in the rb-tree might be freed at any possbile time. It's abviously wrong
to access such data without lock held. As new->type might be changed in
rbt_memtype_check_insert, so save new->type to actual_type, then use
actual_type in dprintk.

Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
---
change from v2:
	update comments.
change from V1:
	fix an access of *new* without memtype_lock held.
---
 arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
index 188e3e0..894a096 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -538,22 +538,25 @@ int reserve_memtype(u64 start, u64 end, enum page_cache_mode req_type,
 	new->type	= actual_type;
 
 	spin_lock(&memtype_lock);
-
 	err = rbt_memtype_check_insert(new, new_type);
+	/*
+	 * new->type might be changed in rbt_memtype_check_insert.
+	 * So save new->type to actual_type as dprintk uses it.
+	 * We are not allowed to touch new after unlocking memtype_lock.
+	 */
+	actual_type = new->type;
+	spin_unlock(&memtype_lock);
+
 	if (err) {
 		pr_info("x86/PAT: reserve_memtype failed [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx], track %s, req %s\n",
 			start, end - 1,
 			cattr_name(new->type), cattr_name(req_type));
 		kfree(new);
-		spin_unlock(&memtype_lock);
-
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&memtype_lock);
-
 	dprintk("reserve_memtype added [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx], track %s, req %s, ret %s\n",
-		start, end - 1, cattr_name(new->type), cattr_name(req_type),
+		start, end - 1, cattr_name(actual_type), cattr_name(req_type),
 		new_type ? cattr_name(*new_type) : "-");
 
 	return err;
-- 
1.9.1

             reply	other threads:[~2015-07-22  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-22  5:38 Pan Xinhui [this message]
2015-07-22  7:46 ` [PATCH V3] x86/mm/pat: Do a small optimization and fix in reserve_memtype Borislav Petkov
2015-07-22  9:06   ` Pan Xinhui
2015-07-22 10:46     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-22 12:54       ` Pan Xinhui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55AF2C68.5010304@intel.com \
    --to=xinhuix.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mnipxh@163.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox