public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.j.ledkov@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs: Remove ext3 filesystem driver In-Reply-To: <20150715124709.GA11446@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:49:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AFAD8F.3040407@linux.intel.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2027 bytes --]

Heya,

So I did a trimmed export of the patch from repository pointed out, and I have a comment about the config change below. I'm pretty sure i probably got the headers wrong, so sorry if i break threading with this email.

On 18/06/15 15:52, Jan Kara wrote:
> The functionality of ext3 is fully supported by ext4 driver. Major
> distributions (SUSE, RedHat) already use ext4 driver to handle ext3
> filesystems for quite some time. There is some ugliness in mm resulting
> from jbd cleaning buffers in a dirty page without cleaning page dirty
> bit and also support for buffer bouncing in the block layer when stable
> pages are required is there only because of jbd. So let's remove the
> ext3 driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> index bf8bc8a..8be84ad 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> @@ -28,14 +28,14 @@ config EXT4_FS
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> -config EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23
> +config EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT2
>  	bool "Use ext4 for ext2/ext3 file systems"
>  	depends on EXT4_FS
> -	depends on EXT3_FS=n || EXT2_FS=n
> +	depends on EXT2_FS=n
>  	default y
>  	help
> -	  Allow the ext4 file system driver code to be used for ext2 or
> -	  ext3 file system mounts.  This allows users to reduce their
> +	  Allow the ext4 file system driver code to be used for ext2
> +	  file system mounts.  This allows users to reduce their
>  	  compiled kernel size by using one file system driver for
>  	  ext2, ext3, and ext4 file systems.

I would prefer not to change the config option name or text, and only change the depends. Cause ext4 driver in fact can be used for ext2/3, and can be used for ext2 or ext3 system mounts. The fact that there isn't an ext3 module anymore, doesn't change ext4 driver.

I presume this option will remain even when both ext2 and ext3 drivers get dropped, such that one can toggle off ext2/3 portions of ext4 driver. Or am I wrong?

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2015-07-22 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-22 14:49 Dimitri John Ledkov [this message]
2015-07-22 17:40 ` fs: Remove ext3 filesystem driver In-Reply-To: <20150715124709.GA11446@quack.suse.cz> Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55AFAD8F.3040407@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dimitri.j.ledkov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox