From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
To: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com,
jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: wangnan0@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pi3orama@163.com, hekuang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] bpf: Add new bpf map type to store the pointer to struct perf_event
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:54:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B170AC.30009@plumgrid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437644562-84431-2-git-send-email-xiakaixu@huawei.com>
On 7/23/15 2:42 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
> Introduce a new bpf map type 'BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY'.
> This map only stores the pointer to struct perf_event. The
> user space event FDs from perf_event_open() syscall are converted
> to the pointer to struct perf_event and stored in map.
...
> +static struct bpf_map *perf_event_array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
> +{
> + /* only the pointer to struct perf_event can be stored in
> + * perf_event_array map
> + */
> + if (attr->value_size != sizeof(u32))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + return array_map_alloc(attr);
> +}
since it's exactly the same as prog_array_map_alloc(),
just rename it to something like 'fd_array_map_alloc'
and use for both types.
> +static int perf_event_array_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> + void *next_key)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static void *perf_event_array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
same for the above two.
rename prog_array_map_* into fd_array_map_* and use for both map types.
> +static struct perf_event *convert_map_with_perf_event(void *value)
> +{
> + struct perf_event *event;
> + u32 fd;
> +
> + fd = *(u32 *)value;
> +
> + event = perf_event_get(fd);
> + if (IS_ERR(event))
> + return NULL;
don't lose error code, do 'return event' instead.
> +
> + /* limit the event type to PERF_TYPE_RAW
> + * and PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE.
> + */
> + if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> + event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
> + return NULL;
perf_event refcnt leak? need to do put_event.
and return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
> +
> + return event;
> +}
> +
> +/* only called from syscall */
> +static int perf_event_array_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> + void *value, u64 map_flags)
> +{
> + struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
> + struct perf_event *event;
> + u32 index = *(u32 *)key;
> +
> + if (map_flags != BPF_ANY)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
> + return -E2BIG;
> +
> + /* check if the value is already stored */
> + if (array->events[index])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* convert the fd to the pointer to struct perf_event */
> + event = convert_map_with_perf_event(value);
imo helper name is misleading and it's too short to be separate
function. Just inline it and you can reuse 'index' variable.
> + if (!event)
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + xchg(array->events + index, event);
refcnt leak of old event! Please think it through.
This type of bugs I shouldn't be finding.
> +static int perf_event_array_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
no way to dec refcnt of perf_event from user space?
why not to do the same as prog_array_delete?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 9:42 [PATCH v3 0/3] bpf: Introduce the new ability of eBPF programs to access hardware PMU counter Kaixu Xia
2015-07-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] bpf: Add new bpf map type to store the pointer to struct perf_event Kaixu Xia
2015-07-23 22:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2015-07-24 2:22 ` xiakaixu
2015-07-24 2:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-03 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter Kaixu Xia
2015-07-23 22:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-24 1:57 ` xiakaixu
2015-08-03 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 10:32 ` xiakaixu
2015-07-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] samples/bpf: example of get selected PMU counter value Kaixu Xia
2015-07-23 22:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-24 1:54 ` xiakaixu
2015-07-24 2:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B170AC.30009@plumgrid.com \
--to=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=xiakaixu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox