From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
yann.morin.1998@free.fr,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] merge_config.sh: Add support to pass arguments to make
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:12:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B20F9C.4020607@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQKJXRkuWnSpyMtp95uOrGYmQkKYGoYwqw-5wUJLF9bFw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Mashahiro,
Thanks for the comments.
On 24/07/15 07:10, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Srinivas,
>
>
> 2015-07-21 22:22 GMT+09:00 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>:
>> The issue is flags like ARCH can be passed to make via environment variable
>> or at command line by passing "ARCH=" argument to make file. The former case
>> works fine if used with merge_config but the later case would not work and
>> resulting config file from merge_config is useless.
>>
>> I hit this issue when I started using config fragments on arm64 bit platform
>> and I usually pass ARCH at the make command line.
>
> Me too. I always pass ARCH from the make command line.
>
> I did a simple test, but I did not hit this issue.
>
> I think both environment variables and make command line variables
> are inherited to sub-processes.
>
> I guess this patch is useful only when we directly invoke this shell script,
> not via the top-level Makefile. But, from your statement, I thought
> you invoke merge_config.sh from the Makefile. So, I cannot understand
> what you mean.
Actually Am invoking the script directly, Is this a valid usage?
If this usage is not valid we can ignore this patch I guess :-)
Sorry I should have put my command line in the log to make it clear.
I use below command:
./scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh -O /objs/
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig distro.conf
>
> Moreover, the top-level Makefile exports ARCH, so it is always an
> environment variable.
>
> See the line 408:
> export ARCH SRCARCH CONFIG_SHELL HOSTCC HOSTCFLAGS CROSS_COMPILE AS LD CC
>
Yes, It works if invoked with make with your patch "kbuild: add generic
mergeconfig target, %.config"
>
>
>
>> As it is common for users like me to pass ARCH variable in command line,
>> providing such flexiblity in merge_config makes more sense.
>>
>> This patch adds support to pass arguments to make file, without this patch the
>> user has to set the enviroment variables which is not explicit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>
>
>
>
--srini
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-24 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-21 13:22 [PATCH RFC] merge_config.sh: Add support to pass arguments to make Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-24 6:10 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-24 10:12 ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B20F9C.4020607@linaro.org \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox