From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency mask model
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:56:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B26E4A.80209@ezchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437669735-8786-8-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On 07/23/2015 12:42 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +static inline void sched_update_tick_dependency(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> + return;
> +
> + cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> +
> + if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(rq->cpu))
> + return;
> +
> + if (sched_can_stop_tick(rq))
> + tick_nohz_clear_tick_dependency_cpu(TICK_SCHED_BIT, cpu);
> + else
> + tick_nohz_set_tick_dependency_cpu(TICK_SCHED_BIT, cpu);
> +}
Is it worth asserting that the rq is locked at this point? Presumably
that's a requirement so that the cpu can't change out from under you.
--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-24 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 16:42 [PATCH 00/10] nohz: Tick dependency mask v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] nohz: Remove idle task special case Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] nohz: Restart nohz full tick from irq exit Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] nohz: Move tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick() above its users Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 04/10] nohz: Remove useless argument on tick_nohz_task_switch() Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 12:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 05/10] nohz: New tick dependency mask Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-24 16:55 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-07-24 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-24 17:43 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-08-03 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 13:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 13:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 13:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 13:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask model Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched: Migrate sched " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-23 16:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-24 16:56 ` Chris Metcalf [this message]
2015-07-29 13:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 14:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 17:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-04 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-10 14:02 ` Juri Lelli
2015-08-10 14:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-10 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-10 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-10 15:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-10 15:43 ` Juri Lelli
2015-08-10 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-10 15:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] posix-cpu-timers: Migrate " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-24 16:57 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-07-29 13:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-29 17:24 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-07-30 0:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-30 14:31 ` Luiz Capitulino
2015-07-30 14:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-30 19:35 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-07-30 19:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-30 19:52 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-07-31 14:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 15:59 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-08-03 18:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 17:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-03 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-06 17:13 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched-clock: " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-23 16:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] nohz: Remove task switch obsolete tick dependency check Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B26E4A.80209@ezchip.com \
--to=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).