From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
"linux-man@vger.kernel.org" <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
bill o gallmeister <bgallmeister@gmail.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Revised futex(2) man page for review
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:10:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B611B9.9030708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150427203705.GE29351@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain>
Hello Pavel,
On 04/27/2015 10:37 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> The FUTEX_WAIT_OP operation is equivalent to execute the follow???
>> ing code atomically and totally ordered with respect to other
>> futex operations on any of the two supplied futex words:
>
> "to executing"?
Yep. Fixed.
>> The operation and comparison that are to be performed are
>> encoded in the bits of the argument val3. Pictorially, the
>> encoding is:
>>
>> +---+---+-----------+-----------+
>> |op |cmp| oparg | cmparg |
>> +---+---+-----------+-----------+
>> 4 4 12 12 <== # of bits
>>
>
> :-)
>
>> RETURN VALUE
>> In the event of an error, all operations return -1 and set errno to
>> indicate the cause of the error. The return value on success depends
>> on the operation, as described in the following list:
>
> Did you say (at the begining) that there is no glibc wrapper?
Yes, this could be clearer. I changed it to
RETURN VALUE
In the event of an error (and assuming that futex() was invoked
via syscall(2)), all operations return -1 and set errno to indi‐
cate the cause of the error.
>> EINVAL The operation in futex_op is one of those that employs a time???
>> out, but the supplied timeout argument was invalid (tv_sec was
>> less than zero, or tv_nsec was not less than 1000,000,000).
>
> 1,000...?
Fixed.
Thanks for the comments!
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-28 8:53 Revised futex(2) man page for review Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-03-28 8:56 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-03-28 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-28 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-31 20:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27 11:00 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-07-27 11:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-03-31 14:45 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27 11:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-07-28 3:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-28 7:44 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-07-28 17:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-28 18:09 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-04-14 21:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-15 10:28 ` Torvald Riegel
2015-07-27 11:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-04-27 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2015-07-27 11:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2015-07-28 2:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-28 6:39 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-03-31 1:48 ` Rusty Russell
2015-07-27 11:03 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B611B9.9030708@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=bgallmeister@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=triegel@redhat.com \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).