From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: public_timo.s@silentcreek.de, robh+dt@kernel.org,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Cc: wens@csie.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:43:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B62768.6040403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727120918.191F76C82FB4@dd34104.kasserver.com>
Hi,
On 27-07-15 14:09, public_timo.s@silentcreek.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
>
>> I've a simular patch here:
>>
>> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/6a30b7d5be6012b81e5e1439a444e41c0ac1afc1
>>
>> I did not submit this upstream yet as it is part of a series to enable the otg
>> controller on the bananapi which needs axp-usb-power-supply support for which
>> the actual powersupply driver changes are still pending.
> Oops, I see. Are you planning to submit this for 4.3 or later?
I plan to submit this for 4.3.
>> As you can see other then you adding the cpu operating points are patches are
>> identical, which is good :)
> Yep, that and you chose a slightly higher maximum voltage for the CPU.
>
>> IMHO we should just stick with the standard operating points unless we know
>> that there are stability issues with them (such as e.g. on the A10 OlinuxIno
>> Lime).
> I'd be fine with that as I don't have any stability issues with the lower
> voltages. What about the 1008MHz operating point that I "reintroduced"? It was
> dropped here [1] because there was no regulator support.
That is in essence an overclocked setting, the max CPU voltage officially is
1.4V, I do not think that we should provide any overclocked settings in the
official dts files. If people really want to overclock they will have to
modify there dts themselves IMHO.
> Can this be reenabled
> on board level (which means overriding the defaults inherited from
> sun7i-a20.dtsi) or should this be done at SOC level for all boards (which
> means we have to add regulator nodes for all boards in the first place)?
Technically this is possible, but I do not think that it is a good idea.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 1:28 [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-27 8:07 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-07-27 12:09 ` public_timo.s
2015-07-27 12:43 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-07-28 9:02 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 12:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-28 14:57 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 12:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-28 14:24 ` Hans de Goede
2015-07-28 15:09 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 15:29 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-02 22:00 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 14:45 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-27 12:36 ` public_timo.s
2015-07-27 12:54 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <CAGb2v65ApKvrj6K+kw43u=0q6=auTsmQjCXhibgZkW+vd5nDqA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-07-28 9:02 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 12:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-28 15:01 ` Timo Sigurdsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B62768.6040403@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=public_timo.s@silentcreek.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).