From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:30:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B65CBF.6010007@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_O=g=Cot56CN1NRASh9osfsGBThCwvyvwPYAP+-VK5LUg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2015/7/27 23:21, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2015/7/25 1:38, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>>>> Something new in kernel 4.2 seems to have broken one of my hard drives
>>>>>> (ssd) in kernel 4.2. 4.1 and older kernels work fine. Here are the
>>>>>> relevant logs.
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [ 6.547628] ata2.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
>>>>>> [ 6.547721] ata2.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
>>>>>> [ 7.007213] ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>>>> [ 16.997819] ata2.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
>>>>>> [ 16.997910] ata2.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
>>>>>> [ 16.997995] ata2: limiting SATA link speed to 3.0 Gbps
>>>>>> [ 17.457400] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
>>>>>> [ 47.429257] ata2.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
>>>>>> [ 47.429349] ata2.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
>>>>>> [ 47.888822] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing really rings a bell. Timeouts on IDENTIFY. Could be IRQ
>>>>> related. Which controller is it (lspci -nn)? Also, can you try to
>>>>> bisect the issue?
>>>>
>>>> 00:11.0 SATA controller [0106]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH
>>>> SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [1022:7801] (rev 40)
>>>> 00:14.1 IDE interface [0101]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH
>>>> IDE Controller [1022:780c]
>>>>
>>>> I can take a look at bisecting later this week.
>>>
>>> You were right about the interrupts. This is an AMD Kaveri APU system.
>> Hi Alex,
>> Could you please help to provide more information about the
>> system so we could identify the issue? Dmesg and /proc/interrupts
>> from good and bad kernels are welcomed.
>> Thanks!
>> Gerry
>
> See attached. Thanks!
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the info. Seems something is wrong with multiple-MSI
support. To narrow down the scope, could you please help to:
1) apply the small patch and retest
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 7e62751abfac..35f524cc23b7 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -1345,6 +1345,7 @@ static int ahci_init_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev,
unsigned int n_ports,
if (nvec < 0)
return nvec;
+ nvec = 1;
/*
* If number of MSIs is less than number of ports then Sharing Last
* Message mode could be enforced. In this case assume that
advantage
2) Disable interrupt remapping by kernel parameter "nointremap"
and retest.
Thanks!
Gerry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 17:48 ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2 Alex Deucher
2015-07-23 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-23 18:44 ` Alex Deucher
2015-07-24 17:38 ` Alex Deucher
2015-07-27 3:01 ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-27 15:21 ` Alex Deucher
2015-07-27 16:30 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-07-27 17:36 ` Alex Deucher
2015-07-28 18:19 ` Alex Deucher
2015-07-28 18:37 ` Alexander Holler
2015-07-30 17:01 ` [Debug Patch] Collect more information about the regression Jiang Liu
2015-07-31 10:38 ` ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2 Alexander Holler
2015-07-31 10:42 ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-31 18:59 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B65CBF.6010007@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).