linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:11:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B6663B.2060707@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437952192.25997.3.camel@stgolabs.net>

On 07/26/2015 07:09 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:12 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Using a locking microbenchmark on the same system, the locking
>> rates in (kops/s) were:
>>
>>    Threads		Rate w/o patch	Rate with patch
>>    -------		--------------	---------------
>>    2 (same socket)	  6,515,265	  7,077,476
>>    2 (diff sockets)	  2,967,145	  4,353,851
> At this level stddev would be nice to have, as these sort of things have
> a lot of variation.
>
> Out of general interest, are these microbenchmarks available? Would you
> care to add something like that to perf-bench? I assume they would
> probably be x86 specific.

Ingo has asked similar question and he suggested doing an user-space 
implementation in perf bench. I will take a further look at that when I 
have time.

Cheers,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-27 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-22 20:12 [PATCH v3 0/7] locking/qspinlock: Enhance pvqspinlock performance Waiman Long
2015-07-22 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Unconditional PV kick with _Q_SLOW_VAL Waiman Long
2015-07-25 22:31   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27  1:46     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27 17:50       ` Waiman Long
2015-07-27 18:41         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-31  8:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-31 17:01     ` Waiman Long
2015-07-22 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support Waiman Long
2015-07-26 23:09   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27 17:11     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2015-07-26 23:48   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27  0:56   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27 17:30     ` Waiman Long
2015-07-27 19:39       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-29 20:49         ` Waiman Long
2015-07-27 20:08       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-22 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long
2015-07-27  1:14   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27 17:33     ` Waiman Long
2015-07-22 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Enable deferment of vCPU kicking to unlock call Waiman Long
2015-07-22 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow vCPUs kick-ahead Waiman Long
2015-07-22 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Waiman Long
2015-07-22 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Optimize PV unlock code path Waiman Long
2015-07-27  1:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] locking/qspinlock: Enhance pvqspinlock performance Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-27 17:36   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55B6663B.2060707@hp.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).