From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64/efi: Mapping Boot and Runtime EFI memory regions to different starting virtual address
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:53:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B9D806.7030705@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438230757-30840-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com>
On 07/29/2015 09:32 PM, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> When testing hibernate, I found the EFI runtime services was broken
> on some old EFI machines on my hand, Intel DQ57TM development board
> and Acer Gateway Z5WT2 notebook.
>
> After printing the EFI memmap and virtual address mapping on -4G area,
> found those issue machines keep the physical address of Runtime
> Data/Code regions unchanged but not Boot Data/Code. The logs were
> attached on openSUSE bug:
> https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=939979
>
> Due to Boot Data/Code can be used by OS as available memory regions,
> so those old EFI BIOS do not keep the physical address of Boot regions
> unchanged. But, address of Runtime regions are the same.
>
> On Intel DQ57TM, sometimes the order of EFI Boot regions changed. On
> Acer Gateway Z5WT2, the amount of EFI Boot regions changed.
>
> The above changing of EFI Boot regions causes the EFI Runtime Data/Code
> may not mapping to constant virtual address, that's because the EFI Boot
> and Runtime regions are interleaved and EFI va mapping applied PMD
> 2M-aligned logic.
>
> A workaround of this situation is mapping Boot and Runtime regions to
> different starting virtual address. Then the changing of Boot Data/Code
> regions will not affect to the virtual address mapping to Runtime
> Data/Code.
>
> This patch adds codes for mapping Boot Data/Code regions start from
> 0xffff_ffff_0000_0000, has 1G space. And mapping Runtime Data/Code
> regions start from 0xffff_fffe_c000_0000 that has 63G space.
>
This changelog is at least partially incomprehensive. It also seems
more than a bit aggressive to expect that 1 GB will be sufficient forever.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 4:32 [PATCH] x86_64/efi: Mapping Boot and Runtime EFI memory regions to different starting virtual address Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-07-30 7:53 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2015-07-30 8:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-30 10:11 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 11:09 ` joeyli
2015-07-30 11:18 ` joeyli
2015-07-30 12:09 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 12:31 ` joeyli
2015-07-30 13:17 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 13:39 ` joeyli
2015-07-30 14:05 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 14:16 ` joeyli
2015-08-19 16:31 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-20 1:05 ` joeyli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B9D806.7030705@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox