From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753428AbbG3QTg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:19:36 -0400
Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:33308 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752644AbbG3QRX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:17:23 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,577,1432598400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="286184785"
Message-ID: <55BA4D08.9070306@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:12:56 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
CC: "security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>,
        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test,
 and config option
References: <cover.1438061139.git.luto@kernel.org>
	<55BA487E.9030708@oracle.com> <20150730160555.GB28617@nazgul.tnic>
In-Reply-To: <20150730160555.GB28617@nazgul.tnic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DLP: MIA2
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 30/07/15 17:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:53:34AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> As far as Xen guests are concerned,
>>
>> Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Does that mean, this patch 1/4 fixes the 32bit issue you guys are still
> debugging on the v4 thread? Or does that need more fixing?
>

I was going to say... This v5 pre-dates figuring out what was wrong with
32bit Xen.  v5 1/4 is still susceptible.

Boris: does your Tested-by cover v5 + proposed fix?

~Andrew