From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"treding@nvidia.com" <treding@nvidia.com>,
"ddaney@caviumnetworks.com" <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
"majun258@huawei.com" <majun258@huawei.com>,
"thunder.leizhen@huawei.com" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
"tirumalesh.chalamarla@caviumnetworks.com"
<tirumalesh.chalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>,
"laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Docs: dt: add generic MSI bindings
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:44:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BF460D.3040901@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727094638.GB9169@leverpostej>
On 27/07/15 10:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 09:02:46AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 23/07/15 17:52, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> Currently msi-parent is used in a couple of drivers despite being fairly
>>> underspecified. This patch adds a generic binding for MSIs (including
>>> the existing msi-parent property) enabling the description of platform
>>> devices capable of using MSIs.
>>>
>>> While MSIs are primarily distinguished by doorbell and payload, some MSI
>>> controllers (e.g. the GICv3 ITS) also use side-band information
>>> accompanying the write to identify the master which originated the MSI,
>>> to allow for sandboxing. This sideband information is non-probeable and
>>> needs to be described in the DT. Other MSI controllers may have
>>> additional configuration details which need to be described per-master.
>>>
>>> This patch adds a generic msi-parent binding document, extending the
>>> de-facto standard with a new (optional) #msi-cells which can be used to
>>> express any per-master configuration and/or sideband data. This is
>>> sufficient to describe non-hotpluggable devices.
>>>
>>> For busses where sideband data may be derived from some bus-specific
>>> master ID scheme, other properties will be required to describe the
>>> mapping.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..c60c034
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
>>> +This document describes the generic device tree binding for MSI controllers and
>>> +their master(s).
>>> +
>>> +Message Signaled Interrupts (MSIs) are a class of interrupts generated by a
>>> +write to an MMIO address.
>>> +
>>> +MSIs were originally specified by PCI (and are used with PCIe), but may also be
>>> +used with other busses, and hence a mechanism is required to relate devices on
>>> +those busses to the MSI controllers which they are capable of using,
>>> +potentially including additional information.
>>> +
>>> +MSIs are distinguished by some combination of:
>>> +
>>> +- The doorbell (the MMIO address written to).
>>> +
>>> + Devices may be configured by software to write to arbitrary doorbells which
>>> + they can address. An MSI controller may feature a number of doorbells.
>>> +
>>> +- The payload (the value written to the doorbell).
>>> +
>>> + Devices may be configured to write an arbitrary payload chosen by software.
>>> + MSI controllers may have restrictions on permitted payloads.
>>> +
>>> +- Sideband information accompanying the write.
>>> +
>>> + Typically this is neither configurable nor probeable, and depends on the path
>>> + taken through the memory system (i.e. it is a property of the combination of
>>> + MSI controller and device rather than a property of either in isolation).
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +MSI controllers:
>>> +================
>>> +
>>> +An MSI controller signals interrupts to a CPU when a write is made to an MMIO
>>> +address by some master. An MSI controller may feature a number of doorbells.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +--------------------
>>> +
>>> +- msi-controller: Identifies the node as an MSI controller.
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +--------------------
>>> +
>>> +- #msi-cells: The number of cells in an msi-specifier, required if not zero.
>>> +
>>> + Typically this will encode information related to sideband data, and will
>>> + not encode doorbells or payloads as these can be configured dynamically.
>>> +
>>> + The meaning of the msi-specifier is defined by the device tree binding of
>>> + the specific MSI controller.
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +MSI clients
>>> +===========
>>> +
>>> +MSI clients are devices which generate MSIs. For each MSI they wish to
>>> +generate, the doorbell and payload may be configured, though sideband
>>> +information may not be configurable.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +--------------------
>>> +
>>> +- msi-parent: A list of phandle + msi-specifier pairs, one for each MSI
>>> + controller which the device is capable of using.
>>> +
>>> + This property is unordered, and MSIs may be allocated from any combination of
>>> + MSI controllers listed in the msi-parent property.
>>> +
>>> + If a device has restrictions on the allocation of MSIs, these restrictions
>>> + must be described with additional properties.
>>> +
>>> + When #msi-cells is non-zero, busses with an msi-parent will require
>>> + additional properties to describe the relationship between devices on the bus
>>> + and the set of MSIs they can potentially generate.
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +Example
>>> +=======
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>> +
>>> + msi_a: msi-controller@a {
>>> + reg = <0xa 0xf00>;
>>> + compatible = "vendor-a,some-controller";
>>> + msi-controller;
>>> + /* No sideband data, so #msi-cells omitted */
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + msi_b: msi-controller@b {
>>> + reg = <0xb 0xf00>;
>>> + compatible = "vendor-b,another-controller";
>>> + msi-controller;
>>> + /* Each device has some unique ID */
>>> + #msi-cells = <1>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + msi_c: msi-controller@c {
>>> + reg = <0xb 0xf00>;
>>> + compatible = "vendor-b,another-controller";
>>> + msi-controller;
>>> + /* Each device has some unique ID */
>>> + #msi-cells = <1>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + dev@0 {
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xf00>;
>>> + compatible = "vendor-c,some-device";
>>> +
>>> + /* Can only generate MSIs to msi_a */
>>> + msi-parent = <&msi_a>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + dev@1 {
>>> + reg = <0x1 0xf00>;
>>> + compatible = "vendor-c,some-device";
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Can generate MSIs to either A or B.
>>> + */
>>> + msi-parent = <&msi_a>, <&msi_b 0x17>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + dev@2 {
>>> + reg = <0x2 0xf00>;
>>> + compatible = "vendor-c,some-device";
>>> + /*
>>> + * Has different IDs at each MSI controller.
>>> + * Can generate MSIs to all of the MSI controllers.
>>> + */
>>> + msi-parent = <&msi_a>, <&msi_b 0x17>, <&msi_c 0x53>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>>
>>
>> This looks quite good for the non-PCI stuff. Should you also cover the
>> PCI usage of msi-parent?
>
> As far as I can tell, the current PCI usage of msi-parent is practically
> identical to the generic usage, with the proviso that the devices under
> a PCI root complex are assumed to be indistinguishable from the root
> complex from the PoV of the MSI controller.
>
> So I'm not sure what would be relevant to describe here.
>
>> I'm can't really see the meaning of #msi-cells in that context. Should
>> it be entirely ignored? OR did you have some specific usage in mind?
>
> It shouldn't be ignored; if the MSI controller has a non-zero #msi-cells
> then it requires that information to operate correctly (e.g. to
> distinguish masters).
>
> It may simply be that all devices under the root complex are
> indistinguishable from each other, but can be distinguished form other
> devices in the system using the same MSI controller.
>
> I also imagine that there may be PCI root complexes which signal their
> own management interrupts as MSIs. Such a root complex needs msi-parent
> to describe its relationship with the MSI controller, which is distinct
> from the relationship between its children and the MSI controller.
Looks tortuous, but why not... ;-)
As an aside, the GICv3 ITS part of the non-PCI MSI support which is
queued for 4.3 is using now this binding to find out about the deviceID,
and I believe Ma Jun is going to use this for his mbigen driver.
I also have additional patches for the core code to parse some of the
properties.
Thanks,
M.
It would be good if we could make some forward progress to merge this
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 16:52 [PATCH 0/3] Generic PCI MSI + IOMMU topology bindings Mark Rutland
2015-07-23 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] Docs: dt: add generic MSI bindings Mark Rutland
2015-07-23 18:26 ` David Daney
2015-07-24 7:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-27 8:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-27 9:46 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-03 10:44 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-08-05 16:51 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-06 7:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-24 10:17 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-24 13:37 ` Rob Herring
2015-08-24 13:47 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-23 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] Docs: dt: Add PCI MSI map bindings Mark Rutland
2015-07-24 23:27 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-07-27 9:16 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-27 8:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 22:33 ` David Daney
2015-09-07 18:05 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-08 15:53 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-09-07 17:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-05 16:39 ` Varun Sethi
2015-08-06 17:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-08 15:06 ` Varun Sethi
[not found] ` <CALRxmdA32xiSX7DDKAJPLR8=bh_9j-6MN124u4KjYGRT8bAKNg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-08-05 19:53 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-08-06 18:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-06 19:46 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-07-23 16:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] Docs: dt: add PCI IOMMU " Mark Rutland
2015-07-24 12:23 ` Robin Murphy
2015-07-24 13:26 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BF460D.3040901@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Robin.Murphy@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majun258@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=tirumalesh.chalamarla@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).