public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/OF: remove invalid DT warnings when booting using ACPI
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BF9D46.1040605@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55BF9AC4.40208@linaro.org>



On 03/08/15 17:45, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/23/2015 07:31 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Since both CONFIG_ACPI and CONFIG_CLKSRC_OF can be enabled on ARM64,
>> we get this device tree warnings even when booting using ACPI which is
>> not valid. We can use of_have_populated_dt to check if the device tree
>> is populated or not and avoid spurious warning.
>>
>> This patch uses of_have_populated_dt to remove this non legitimate device
>> tree warning when booting using ACPI tables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>>    drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c | 2 +-
>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
>> index 0093a8e49e14..47823a2d7220 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,6 @@ void __init clocksource_of_init(void)
>>    		init_func(np);
>>    		clocksources++;
>>    	}
>> -	if (!clocksources)
>> +	if (of_have_populated_dt() && !clocksources)
>>    		pr_crit("%s: no matching clocksources found\n", __func__);
>>    }
>
> Hmm, even if the fix looks correct, it doesn't make sense to put it there.
>

I thought of exactly the same at first. IMO, we are not fixing it at the
source but at the call site instead which is fine and I don't have
strong opinion on that. However I also came to know recently that
CONFIG_OF can be now enabled on x86, so I preferred that.

Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-03 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-23 17:31 [PATCH] clocksource/OF: remove invalid DT warnings when booting using ACPI Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 16:45 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-08-03 16:56   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-08-03 17:22     ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55BF9D46.1040605@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox