From: Andrea Scian - DAVE Embedded Systems <andrea.scian@dave.eu>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Kedareswara rao Appana <appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>
Cc: mkl@pengutronix.de, wg@grandegger.com, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx: fix RX FIFO overflow error handling
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:01:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C26B98.1010401@dave.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B1BBEA.7020506@xilinx.com>
Michal,
Kedar,
Any feedback regarding my patch?
Have you ever experienced such a problem?
Andrea SCIAN
*DAVE Embedded Systems*
via Talponedo 29/A 33080 Porcia (PN) - Italy
Telephone: +39.0434.921215
Telefax: +39.0434.1994030
web: www.dave.eu <http://www.dave.eu>
Il 24/07/2015 06:15, Michal Simek ha scritto:
> + Kedar
>
> On 07/23/2015 11:13 PM, Andrea Scian wrote:
>> Simply resetting the peripheral on RX FIFO overflow in not enough,
>> because we also need to re-initialize the whole device.
>> Also always enable RX FIFO overflow interrupt otherwise we may hang
>> until another interrupt arrives (this happens if FIFO overrun and just
>> read from CAN bus with candump)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrea Scian <andrea.scian@dave.eu>
>> ---
>>
>> You can reproduce the problem with the following test-bed
>> * connect a Zynq based board to a PC with a CAN bus adapter (e.g. PCAN USB)
>> * start sending lots of CAN messages to Zynq system
>> * configure and start xilinx CAN driver
>> ** canconfig can0 bitrate 1000000
>> ** canconfig can0 start
>> * try to send/receive messages (cansend/candump)
>> * if you send a CAN message you'll get the RX FIFO error and additional messages
>> will not be received
>> * if you try to get messages you simple don't receive them (no interrupt triggered)
>> * with canconfig stop/start the hang goes away (if the others peers stop sending
>> send lots of messages ;-) )
>>
>> I tested the patch over xilinx-2014.04 kernel, but the patch applies cleanly to
>> mainline too.
>>
>> If someone has a better understanding of Xilinx CAN driver, please let me know if
>> it's better to handle the error in a different manner.
>>
>> Maybe the bus off handler need the same threadment too.
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> Andrea Scian
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
>> index 5e8b560..c278177 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ enum xcan_reg {
>> #define XCAN_INTR_ALL (XCAN_IXR_TXOK_MASK | XCAN_IXR_BSOFF_MASK |\
>> XCAN_IXR_WKUP_MASK | XCAN_IXR_SLP_MASK | \
>> XCAN_IXR_RXNEMP_MASK | XCAN_IXR_ERROR_MASK | \
>> + XCAN_IXR_RXOFLW_MASK | \
>> XCAN_IXR_ARBLST_MASK | XCAN_IXR_RXOK_MASK)
>>
>> /* CAN register bit shift - XCAN_<REG>_<BIT>_SHIFT */
>> @@ -526,6 +527,7 @@ static int xcan_rx(struct net_device *ndev)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +static void xcan_chip_stop(struct net_device *ndev);
>> /**
>> * xcan_err_interrupt - error frame Isr
>> * @ndev: net_device pointer
>> @@ -597,7 +599,8 @@ static void xcan_err_interrupt(struct net_device *ndev, u32 isr)
>> if (isr & XCAN_IXR_RXOFLW_MASK) {
>> stats->rx_over_errors++;
>> stats->rx_errors++;
>> - priv->write_reg(priv, XCAN_SRR_OFFSET, XCAN_SRR_RESET_MASK);
>> + xcan_chip_stop(ndev);
>> + xcan_chip_start(ndev);
>> if (skb) {
>> cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
>> cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_OVERFLOW;
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1437685986-25824-1-git-send-email-andrea.scian@dave.eu>
2015-07-24 4:15 ` [PATCH] can: xilinx: fix RX FIFO overflow error handling Michal Simek
2015-07-28 8:07 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-08-05 20:01 ` Andrea Scian - DAVE Embedded Systems [this message]
2015-10-22 4:46 ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C26B98.1010401@dave.eu \
--to=andrea.scian@dave.eu \
--cc=appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox