From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] test_user_copy improvements
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:01:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C33096.1070206@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150806095009.GA8498@roeck-us.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2223 bytes --]
On 06/08/15 10:50, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:48:48PM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
>> These patches extend the test_user_copy test module to handle lots more
>> cases of user accessors which architectures can override separately, and
>> in particular those which are important for checking the MIPS Enhanced
>> Virtual Addressing (EVA) implementations, which need to handle
>> overlapping user and kernel address spaces, with special instructions
>> for accessing user address space from kernel mode.
>>
>> - Checking that kernel pointers are accepted when user address limit is
>> set to KERNEL_DS, as done by the kernel when it internally invokes
>> system calls with kernel pointers.
>> - Checking of the unchecked accessors (which don't call access_ok()).
>> Some of the tests are special cased for EVA at the moment which has
>> stricter hardware guarantees for bad user accesses than other
>> configurations.
>> - Checking of other sets of user accessors, including the inatomic user
>> copies, copy_in_user, clear_user, the user string accessors, and the
>> user checksum functions, all of which need special handling in arch
>> code with EVA.
>>
>> Tested on MIPS with and without EVA, and on x86_64.
>>
> The series causes several build failures with other architectures.
Thanks Guenter, and sorry for the breakage. I've already got some fixes
lined up. From the failure logs it looks like #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT for
[__]copy_in_user and #ifndef _HAVE_ARCH_COPY_AND_CSUM_FROM_USER for the
the ppc64 csum_partial_copy_from_user one Stephen caught should sort it out.
Cheers
James
>
> From next-20150806:
>
> Build results:
> total: 152 pass: 138 fail: 14
> Failed builds:
> alpha:allmodconfig (*)
> arm:allmodconfig (*)
> arm:omap2plus_defconfig
> arm64:allmodconfig
> i386:allyesconfig (*)
> i386:allmodconfig (*)
> m68k:defconfig (*)
> m68k:allmodconfig (*)
> m68k:sun3_defconfig (*)
> mips:allmodconfig
> parisc:allmodconfig
> s390:allmodconfig
> sparc32:allmodconfig (*)
> xtensa:allmodconfig (*)
>
> The builds marked with (*) fail because of your patch series.
>
> Guenter
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 15:48 [PATCH 0/7] test_user_copy improvements James Hogan
2015-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] test_user_copy: Check legit kernel accesses James Hogan
2015-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] test_user_copy: Check unchecked accessors James Hogan
2015-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] test_user_copy: Check __clear_user()/clear_user() James Hogan
2015-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] test_user_copy: Check __copy_in_user()/copy_in_user() James Hogan
2015-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] test_user_copy: Check __copy_{to,from}_user_inatomic() James Hogan
2015-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] test_user_copy: Check user string accessors James Hogan
2015-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] test_user_copy: Check user checksum functions James Hogan
2015-08-05 20:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] test_user_copy improvements Kees Cook
2015-08-06 16:28 ` James Hogan
2015-08-06 9:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-06 10:01 ` James Hogan [this message]
2015-08-06 15:02 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C33096.1070206@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox