From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755599AbbHFLTV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 07:19:21 -0400 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:56287 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755574AbbHFLTT (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 07:19:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Implement support for T100 touch object To: Sjoerd Simons , Dirk Behme , Dmitry Torokhov References: <1426600846-13346-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1426600846-13346-2-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <55C33C30.9080807@de.bosch.com> <1438859498.3362.12.camel@collabora.co.uk> Cc: Henrik Rydberg , Nick Dyer , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Yufeng Shen , Benson Leung , Chung-yih Wang , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <55C342B0.1060301@osg.samsung.com> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:19:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438859498.3362.12.camel@collabora.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 08/06/2015 01:11 PM, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > + Corrected Javiers e-mail address. > On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 12:51 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: >> On 17.03.2015 15:00, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> >> Having this patch in mainline as commit >> b23157dc74272ac8ebffd1a566e3e822dbc3e65f [1] breaks our Atmel touch. >> >> It seems that above >> >> + set_bit(EV_ABS, input_dev->evbit); >> >> is missing in the version which went into mainline? Re-adding it >> makes >> it work for us, again. >> >> Opinions? > > In mainline the EV_ABS bit automatically gets set as soon as > input_set_abs_params get called. > > If you're using this patch on an older kernel you should backport > 2c9a9cfec04f2c6ed7b4e607cd53ca903b2c4642 as well. > That's correct. The reason why the original patch had that it's because it was forward ported from an older kernel and I missed that detail when doing the rebase. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America