From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932191AbbHFMUR (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 08:20:17 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36046 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755057AbbHFMUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 08:20:16 -0400 To: "jeremy@goop.org" , "chrisw@sous-sol.org" , Alok Kataria , Rusty Russell , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List From: Juergen Gross Subject: maintainership of arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h Message-ID: <55C350FD.6050004@suse.com> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:20:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I just realized that according to MAINTAINERS the file arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h isn't part of the PARAVIRT_OPS INTERFACE, but of x86. Is this on purpose? I don't think so. Juergen