From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754433AbbHJPoa (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:44:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38299 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753386AbbHJPoZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:44:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm:s390:Fix assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is always run successfully To: nick , gleb@kernel.org References: <1438880754-27149-1-git-send-email-xerofoify@gmail.com> <55C45BB7.6020502@redhat.com> <55C8C16F.2020906@gmail.com> Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <55C8C6D2.7030806@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:44:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55C8C16F.2020906@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/08/2015 17:21, nick wrote: > > Seems good. > > > > Paolo > > If it makes it easier for you to trust my patches I can show at least 10 bug fixes for other subsystems > to prove that I am trying to do this correctly. That's up to those maintainers... I definitely see some improvement in your patches, though I still haven't answered the submissions that in my opinion are a bit more problematic. Paolo