linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"edward.nevill@linaro.org" <edward.nevill@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] arm64: feature registers: Documentation
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:58:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C9B918.90807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C9B51D.1060601@arm.com>

On 11/08/15 09:41, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> The REVIDR has to be used in conjunction with the MIDR to make real sense.

Sure, of course.

> We cannot guarantee that the REVIDR that we read (would) belong to the CPU
> where MIDR would have been read (unless the process is pinned) and hence the
> user may not be able to make any use of the information.

Well, yes, nothing is perfect.  The situation we're in now, for example,
is that if we see Cortex A57 we have to assume Cortex A53 and include
workarounds.  People might mix and match processors.  So it goes.

> Steve has a patch [1]
> to expose the MIDR,REVIDR info via sysfs.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/24/420

OK.  As long as I can get at it I'm happy.

Andrew.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-11  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-24  9:43 [RFC PATCH 00/10] arm64: Expose CPU feature registers Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] arm64: feature registers: Documentation Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-08-10 16:06   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-08-10 17:36     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-08-10 17:48       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-11 14:23         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-08-11 15:37           ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-10 15:55             ` Dave Martin
2015-08-10 18:19       ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-11  8:41         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-08-11  8:58           ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2015-08-11 14:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-08-11 15:18         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] arm64: Make the CPU information more clear Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] arm64: Delay ELF HWCAP initialisation until all CPUs are up Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] arm64: Consolidate cpuinfo handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-08-05 14:58   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] arm64: Add helper to decode register from instruction Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] arm64: Expose feature registers by emulating MRS Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] arm64: Emulate ID registers Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] arm64: Read system wide CPUID value Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] arm64: Use system-wide safe value of CPU feature register Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-07-24  9:43 ` sample: arm64 cpu feature: Test program Suzuki K. Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C9B918.90807@redhat.com \
    --to=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=edward.nevill@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).