From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <tony.luck@intel.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<hpa@zytor.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <zhangliguang@huawei.com>,
<rui.xiang@huawei.com>, <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: fix failed to reenable cmci when swiching to interrupt mode
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:52:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB336B.8080708@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150812095457.GB14011@nazgul.tnic>
On 2015/8/12 17:54, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:51:11AM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
>> Zhang Liguang report a bug as bellow:
>> 1) system detected cmci storm on current cpu
>> 2) disable cmci interrupt on banks ownd by current cpu, then swiching to poll mode
>> 3) a few minites later, system swiching to interrupt mode on current cpu
>> 4) we expect system to reenable cmci interrupt on banks ownd by current cpu
>> mce_intel_adjust_timer
>> |-> cmci_reenable
>> |-> cmci_discover # but, ownd banks is ignore here
>>
>>> static void cmci_discover(int banks)
>>> ...
>>> for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
>>> ...
>>> if (test_bit(i, owned)) # ownd banks is ignore here
>>> continue;
>>
>> In this patch, we add a func cmci_storm_set_cmci(), just to enable or
>
> Yeah, that's too many "cmci"'s in the name. Here's what I committed:
It looks much better than me.
Thanks.
>
> ---
> From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:51:11 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/mce: Reenable CMCI banks when swiching back to interrupt mode
>
> Zhang Liguang reported the following issue:
>
> 1) System detects a CMCI storm on the current CPU.
>
> 2) Kernel disables the CMCI interrupt on banks owned by the current CPU and
> switches to poll mode
>
> 3) After the CMCI storm subsides, kernel switches back to interrupt mode
>
> 4) We expect the system to reenable the CMCI interrupt on banks owned by
> the current CPU
>
> mce_intel_adjust_timer
> |-> cmci_reenable
> |-> cmci_discover # owned banks are ignored here
>
> static void cmci_discover(int banks)
> ...
> for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
> ...
> if (test_bit(i, owned)) # ownd banks is ignore here
> continue;
>
> So convert cmci_storm_disable_banks() to cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode()
> which controls whether to enable or disable CMCI interrupts with its
> argument.
>
> NB: We cannot clear the owned bit because the banks won't be polled,
> otherwise. See
>
> 27f6c573e0f7 ("x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms")
>
> for more info.
>
> Reported-by: Zhang Liguang <zhangliguang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: rui.xiang@huawei.com
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439347871-2702-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> index c5c003291861..1e8bb6c94f14 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,27 @@ void mce_intel_hcpu_update(unsigned long cpu)
> per_cpu(cmci_storm_state, cpu) = CMCI_STORM_NONE;
> }
>
> +static void cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode(bool on)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags, *owned;
> + int bank;
> + u64 val;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> + owned = this_cpu_ptr(mce_banks_owned);
> + for_each_set_bit(bank, owned, MAX_NR_BANKS) {
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> +
> + if (on)
> + val |= MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> + else
> + val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> +
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> unsigned long cmci_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
> {
> if ((this_cpu_read(cmci_backoff_cnt) > 0) &&
> @@ -175,7 +196,7 @@ unsigned long cmci_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
> */
> if (!atomic_read(&cmci_storm_on_cpus)) {
> __this_cpu_write(cmci_storm_state, CMCI_STORM_NONE);
> - cmci_reenable();
> + cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode(true);
> cmci_recheck();
> }
> return CMCI_POLL_INTERVAL;
> @@ -186,22 +207,6 @@ unsigned long cmci_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
> }
> }
>
> -static void cmci_storm_disable_banks(void)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags, *owned;
> - int bank;
> - u64 val;
> -
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> - owned = this_cpu_ptr(mce_banks_owned);
> - for_each_set_bit(bank, owned, MAX_NR_BANKS) {
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> - val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> - wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> - }
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
> {
> unsigned int cnt = __this_cpu_read(cmci_storm_cnt);
> @@ -223,7 +228,7 @@ static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
> if (cnt <= CMCI_STORM_THRESHOLD)
> return false;
>
> - cmci_storm_disable_banks();
> + cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode(false);
> __this_cpu_write(cmci_storm_state, CMCI_STORM_ACTIVE);
> r = atomic_add_return(1, &cmci_storm_on_cpus);
> mce_timer_kick(CMCI_STORM_INTERVAL);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-12 2:51 [PATCH v2] x86/mce: fix failed to reenable cmci when swiching to interrupt mode Xie XiuQi
2015-08-12 9:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-08-12 11:52 ` Xie XiuQi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CB336B.8080708@huawei.com \
--to=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangliguang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox