public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <tony.luck@intel.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <zhangliguang@huawei.com>,
	<rui.xiang@huawei.com>, <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: fix failed to reenable cmci when swiching to interrupt mode
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:52:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB336B.8080708@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150812095457.GB14011@nazgul.tnic>

On 2015/8/12 17:54, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:51:11AM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
>> Zhang Liguang report a bug as bellow:
>> 1) system detected cmci storm on current cpu
>> 2) disable cmci interrupt on banks ownd by current cpu, then swiching to poll mode
>> 3) a few minites later, system swiching to interrupt mode on current cpu
>> 4) we expect system to reenable cmci interrupt on banks ownd by current cpu
>>     mce_intel_adjust_timer
>>     |-> cmci_reenable
>>         |-> cmci_discover     # but, ownd banks is ignore here
>>
>>> static void cmci_discover(int banks)
>>> 	...
>>> 	for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
>>> 		...
>>> 		if (test_bit(i, owned))	# ownd banks is ignore here
>>> 			continue;
>>
>> In this patch, we add a func cmci_storm_set_cmci(), just to enable or
>
> Yeah, that's too many "cmci"'s in the name. Here's what I committed:

It looks much better than me.

Thanks.

>
> ---
> From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:51:11 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/mce: Reenable CMCI banks when swiching back to interrupt mode
>
> Zhang Liguang reported the following issue:
>
> 1) System detects a CMCI storm on the current CPU.
>
> 2) Kernel disables the CMCI interrupt on banks owned by the current CPU and
>     switches to poll mode
>
> 3) After the CMCI storm subsides, kernel switches back to interrupt mode
>
> 4) We expect the system to reenable the CMCI interrupt on banks owned by
>     the current CPU
>
>     mce_intel_adjust_timer
>     |-> cmci_reenable
>         |-> cmci_discover     # owned banks are ignored here
>
> static void cmci_discover(int banks)
> 	...
> 	for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
> 		...
> 		if (test_bit(i, owned))	# ownd banks is ignore here
> 			continue;
>
> So convert cmci_storm_disable_banks() to cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode()
> which controls whether to enable or disable CMCI interrupts with its
> argument.
>
> NB: We cannot clear the owned bit because the banks won't be polled,
> otherwise. See
>
>    27f6c573e0f7 ("x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms")
>
> for more info.
>
> Reported-by: Zhang Liguang <zhangliguang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>  # v3.15+
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: rui.xiang@huawei.com
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439347871-2702-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> index c5c003291861..1e8bb6c94f14 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,27 @@ void mce_intel_hcpu_update(unsigned long cpu)
>   	per_cpu(cmci_storm_state, cpu) = CMCI_STORM_NONE;
>   }
>
> +static void cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode(bool on)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags, *owned;
> +	int bank;
> +	u64 val;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> +	owned = this_cpu_ptr(mce_banks_owned);
> +	for_each_set_bit(bank, owned, MAX_NR_BANKS) {
> +		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> +
> +		if (on)
> +			val |= MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> +		else
> +			val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> +
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> +	}
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
>   unsigned long cmci_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
>   {
>   	if ((this_cpu_read(cmci_backoff_cnt) > 0) &&
> @@ -175,7 +196,7 @@ unsigned long cmci_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
>   		 */
>   		if (!atomic_read(&cmci_storm_on_cpus)) {
>   			__this_cpu_write(cmci_storm_state, CMCI_STORM_NONE);
> -			cmci_reenable();
> +			cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode(true);
>   			cmci_recheck();
>   		}
>   		return CMCI_POLL_INTERVAL;
> @@ -186,22 +207,6 @@ unsigned long cmci_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
>   	}
>   }
>
> -static void cmci_storm_disable_banks(void)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags, *owned;
> -	int bank;
> -	u64 val;
> -
> -	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> -	owned = this_cpu_ptr(mce_banks_owned);
> -	for_each_set_bit(bank, owned, MAX_NR_BANKS) {
> -		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> -		val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> -		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> -	}
> -	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
>   static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
>   {
>   	unsigned int cnt = __this_cpu_read(cmci_storm_cnt);
> @@ -223,7 +228,7 @@ static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
>   	if (cnt <= CMCI_STORM_THRESHOLD)
>   		return false;
>
> -	cmci_storm_disable_banks();
> +	cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode(false);
>   	__this_cpu_write(cmci_storm_state, CMCI_STORM_ACTIVE);
>   	r = atomic_add_return(1, &cmci_storm_on_cpus);
>   	mce_timer_kick(CMCI_STORM_INTERVAL);
>


      reply	other threads:[~2015-08-12 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-12  2:51 [PATCH v2] x86/mce: fix failed to reenable cmci when swiching to interrupt mode Xie XiuQi
2015-08-12  9:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-08-12 11:52   ` Xie XiuQi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55CB336B.8080708@huawei.com \
    --to=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangliguang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox