From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>
To: hramrach@gmail.com
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
"Seungwon Jeon" <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
"Jaehoon Chung" <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
"David Lanzendörfer" <david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:57:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB5ED7.40406@schinagl.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMqctSdkPgDfBCNsGNsNnoh4GqVW59oZC3q9HX3gY_NneMPKw@mail.gmail.com>
The thing is, I never saw the prints in my console (i assume that it
prints on the console by default with earlyprintk/debug stuff enabled as
per sunxi-usual)?
P.S. what I do as a basic test, is on our very very minimal empty debian
image (think < 150 mb) i do a apt-get build-essential that installs
about 150mb worth of packages.
Without these patches, everything works as before. All packages
successfully installed. I can do more intense testing later, but I
figured that this is pretty intense.
Olliver
On 12-08-15 15:37, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 12 August 2015 at 15:19, Olliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On 12-08-15 14:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 12-08-15 14:23, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>>> When core does not set the MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING flag enable
>>>> automatic hardware controlled clock gating on the mmc interface.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> In general this looks good, but I wonder how intensively this has
>>> been tested ?
>> It doesn't matter actually, it took some time longer, but the mmc still
>> craps out even with Michal's 3 patches. I'll revert hans's earlier patch
>> again and do a bit more extensive testing.
> Does the oclk switch timeout even after 750ms?
>
> In some earlier tests I tried to enable/disable the clock repeatedly
> when it failed but it seemed to have little effect on the total time
> it took to disable the clock in the end.
>
> Maybe it would be worh trying to set the timeout to some insanely long
> value and test stability with that. I picked 750 as around twice the
> maximum time it ever took on my board.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michal
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1439381423.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <7f9c6f99b31702c02436ef3356b3ebffa4754260.1439381423.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
2015-08-12 12:32 ` [PATCH resend 1/3] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff Hans de Goede
2015-08-12 12:40 ` [linux-sunxi] " Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 13:04 ` Michal Suchanek
[not found] ` <bdcb7ce26f359b7fedbd8559eb275c324bfb52bb.1439386047.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
2015-08-12 14:49 ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 " Hans de Goede
2015-08-25 12:06 ` Ulf Hansson
[not found] ` <c33b221f9b622e3bad9d855a7ad1887b82827244.1439381423.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
2015-08-12 12:35 ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating Hans de Goede
2015-08-12 12:53 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:19 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 14:57 ` Olliver Schinagl [this message]
[not found] ` <3d03bfe2c18789eefa038018467c9c63c94ae4a2.1439381423.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
2015-08-17 1:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: simplify the SDMMC_CLKEN_LOW_PWR logic Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 5:52 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 11:26 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 14:42 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-08-17 14:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 16:21 ` Alim Akhtar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CB5ED7.40406@schinagl.nl \
--to=oliver+list@schinagl.nl \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox