From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751514AbbHMKd1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 06:33:27 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:34054 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbbHMKd0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 06:33:26 -0400 Message-ID: <55CC7271.5040202@arm.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:33:21 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grygorii Strashko , Marc Zyngier CC: Sudeep Holla , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "jason@lakedaemon.net" , "tony@atomide.com" , "nsekhar@ti.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "balbi@ti.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] genirq: fix irqchip_set_wake_parent if IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE References: <1439401562-28874-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <1439401562-28874-3-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <55CC5B2F.7060503@arm.com> <55CC68A0.40101@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <55CC68A0.40101@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/08/15 10:51, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 08/13/2015 11:54 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> >> On 12/08/15 18:45, Grygorii Strashko wrote: [...] >>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c >>> index 6de638b..bdb1b9d 100644 >>> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c >>> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c >>> @@ -1024,6 +1024,10 @@ int irq_chip_set_vcpu_affinity_parent(struct >>> irq_data *data, void *vcpu_info) >>> int irq_chip_set_wake_parent(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on) >>> { >>> data = data->parent_data; >>> + >>> + if (irq_data_get_irq_chip(data)->flags & IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE) >>> + return 0; >>> + >> >> [Nit] I think the irq core can access data->chip directly. Either way, >> it's better to be consistent, the statement following doesn't use helper >> function. > > thanks. I'll change it to: > if (data->chip->flags & IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE) > return 0; > >> >> Otherwise looks good to me. > > Does it means that I can add your Reviewed-by: with above change? > Yes you can. Regards, Sudeep