From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Sedat Dilek" <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [4.2-rc4] acpi|drm|i915: circular locking dependency: acpi_video_get_backlight_type
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:24:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CDA5D3.9030606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55CCAACF.7040109@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 13-08-15 16:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12-08-15 21:26, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> this my first build of a 4.2-rcN Linux-kernel and I see this...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just FYI:
>>>>
>>>> I am *not* seeing this with drm-intel-nightly from below url.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I plan to test Linux v4.2-rc5.
>>>>
>>>
>>> [ CC Linus ]
>>>
>>> Knock Knock Knock.
>>>
>>> This issue still remains here (with CONFIG_DRM_I915=m)...
>>>
>>> [ 18.269792] ======================================================
>>> [ 18.269798] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>>> [ 18.269805] 4.2.0-rc6-1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
>>> [ 18.269810] -------------------------------------------------------
>>> [ 18.269816] modprobe/727 is trying to acquire lock:
>>> [ 18.269822] (init_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0090f2d>]
>>> acpi_video_get_backlight_type+0x17/0x164 [video]
>>> [ 18.269840]
>>> [ 18.269840] but task is already holding lock:
>>> [ 18.269848] (&(&backlight_notifier)->rwsem){++++..}, at:
>>> [<ffffffff810a6519>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x39/0x70
>>> [ 18.269864]
>>> [ 18.269864] which lock already depends on the new lock.
>>> [ 18.269864]
>>> [ 18.269875]
>>> [ 18.269875] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>>> [ 18.269884]
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Full dmesg log and kernel-config attached.
>>>
>>> Shall I add Rusty and modules/modprobe folks?
>>
>> Just got back from vacation and was greeted by this same lockdep splat.
>>
>> On a hunch I reverted
>>
>> commit 93a291dfaf9c328ca5a9cea1733af1a128efe890
>> Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue Jun 16 16:27:52 2015 +0200
>>
>> ACPI / video: Move backlight notifier to video_detect.c
>>
>> and the problem seems to be gone. Hans, any thoughts?
>
> Looking into this atm, lockdep clearly is right.
>
> Sorry about this I have put a lot of thinking into avoiding
> these kind of issues with this patch-set, but I did not realize
> there was another lock "hiding" inside the notifier-chain.
>
> Further analysis shows that the lock inside the notifier-chain
> causes similar problems vs register_count_mutex from
> drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c. I'm working on a fix for this
> atm.
Heh, look at what I just found (I'm shifting my work focus
in the direction of nouveau) :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152876
So it looks like we have had the root cause of this issue
for a long time already, maybe my recent backlight selection
logic cleanup / rework has made it easier to trigger the
lockdep warning for this though.
Anyhow assuming people are ok with the fix I submitted
yesterday we've a fix for this now.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-26 22:33 [4.2-rc4] acpi|drm|i915: circular locking dependency: acpi_video_get_backlight_type Sedat Dilek
2015-08-01 12:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-10 18:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-12 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-13 3:30 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-08-13 6:52 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-13 11:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-13 14:33 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-13 20:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-14 8:24 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-08-14 9:33 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-13 1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CDA5D3.9030606@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox