From: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
ghackmann@google.com, robdclark@gmail.com, david.brown@arm.com,
romlem@google.com, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/android: Update ION TODO per LPC discussion
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:10:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D793D4.4050500@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440190977-10050-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
sgtm. Thanks for keeping me in the loop.
Tiago
On 08/21/2015 06:02 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We discussed a bit with the folks on the Cc: list below what to do
> with ION. Two big take-aways:
>
> - High-performance drivers (like gpus) always want to play tricks with
> coherency and will lie to the dma api (radeon, nouveau, i915 gpu
> drivers all do so in upstream). What needs to be done here is fill
> gaps in dma-buf so that we can do this without breaking the dma-api
> expections of other clients like v4l. The consesus is that hw won't
> stop needing these tricks anytime soon.
>
> - Placement constraints for shared buffers won't be solved any other
> way than through something platform-specific like ion with
> platform-specific knowledge in userspace in something like gralloc.
> For general-purpose devices where this assumption would be painful
> for userspace (like servers) the consensus is that such devices will
> have proper MMUs where placement constraint handling is fairly
> irrelevant.
>
> Hence it is reasonable to destage ion as-is without changing the
> overall design to enable these use-cases and just fixing up a these
> few fairly minor things. Since there won't relly be an open-source
> userspace for ion (and hence drm maintainers won't take it) the
> proposal is to eventually move it to drivers/android/ion.[hc]. Laura
> would be ok with being maintainer once this is all done and ion is
> destaged.
>
> Note that Thiago is working on exposing the cpu cache flushing for
> cpu access from userspace through mmaps so this is alread in progress.
> Also adding him to the Cc: list.
>
> v2: Add ION_IOC_IMPORT to the list of ioctl that probably should go.
>
> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> Cc: sumit.semwal@linaro.org
> Cc: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
> Cc: ghackmann@google.com
> Cc: robdclark@gmail.com
> Cc: david.brown@arm.com
> Cc: romlem@google.com
> Cc: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/TODO | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/TODO b/drivers/staging/android/TODO
> index 06954cdf3dba..bc84a72af32d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/TODO
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/TODO
> @@ -13,5 +13,25 @@ TODO:
> - This bug is introduced by Xiong Zhou in the patch bd471258f2e09
> - ("staging: android: logger: use kuid_t instead of uid_t")
>
> +
> +ion/
> + - Remove ION_IOC_SYNC: Flushing for devices should be purely a kernel internal
> + interface on top of dma-buf. flush_for_device needs to be added to dma-buf
> + first.
> + - Remove ION_IOC_CUSTOM: Atm used for cache flushing for cpu access in some
> + vendor trees. Should be replaced with an ioctl on the dma-buf to expose the
> + begin/end_cpu_access hooks to userspace.
> + - Clarify the tricks ion plays with explicitly managing coherency behind the
> + dma api's back (this is absolutely needed for high-perf gpu drivers): Add an
> + explicit coherency management mode to flush_for_device to be used by drivers
> + which want to manage caches themselves and which indicates whether cpu caches
> + need flushing.
> + - With those removed there's probably no use for ION_IOC_IMPORT anymore either
> + since ion would just be the central allocator for shared buffers.
> + - Add dt-binding to expose cma regions as ion heaps, with the rule that any
> + such cma regions must already be used by some device for dma. I.e. ion only
> + exposes existing cma regions and doesn't reserve unecessarily memory when
> + booting a system which doesn't use ion.
> +
> Please send patches to Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> and Cc:
> Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-21 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 21:02 [PATCH] staging/android: Update ION TODO per LPC discussion Daniel Vetter
2015-08-21 21:10 ` Tiago Vignatti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D793D4.4050500@intel.com \
--to=tiago.vignatti@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=david.brown@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ghackmann@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=romlem@google.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox